Skip to main content

Inter-American Obligations on Human Rights

  • Chapter
  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

The questions raised in this chapter concern existing and proposed inter-American obligations in the field of human rights. What obligations on human rights have the American states assumed by ratifying the OAS Charter? Is the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man legally binding? If not, what is its status? What obligations would a party to the American Convention on Human Rights assume, and what are the prospects for its entry into force?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Two other principal treaties of the inter-American system are the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance (Rio Treaty), adopted in 1947, and the Inter-American Treaty on Pacific Settlement (Pact of Bogotà), adopted in 1948. For an exhaustive study of the original and revised OAS Charters see Margaret Ball, The OAS in Transition ( Durham: Duke University Press, 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ann Van Wynen Thomas and A. J. Thomas, Jr., The Organization of American States ( Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1963 ), p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., 142–143.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Inter-American Juridical Committee, Study of the Juridical Relationship Between Respect for Human Rights and the Exercise of Democracy ( Pan American Union: Washington, D.C., May, 1960 ), pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. lbid., pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a general discussion of this problem see Thomas and Thomas, The Organization of American States, Chapter XIV.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., pp. 236–239; pp. 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  14. José Cabranes, “Human Rights and Non-Intervention in the Inter-American System,” Michigan Law Review (Vol. 65, No. 5), March, 1967, 1147–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For the first draft, see Pan American Union, Inter-American Juridical Committee, Draft Declaration of the International Rights and Duties of Man and Accompanying Report, Washington, D.C., March, 1946. (Hereafter cited as First Draft of the Declaration.)

    Google Scholar 

  16. For the second draft, see Pan American Union, Inter-American Juridical Committee, Project of Declaration of the International Rights and Duties of Man, Washington, D.C., 1948. (Hereafter cited as Second Draft of the Declaration.)

    Google Scholar 

  17. IAJC, First Draft of the Declaration, pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., pp. 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  25. IAJC, Second Draft of the Declaration, p. 12 of the “Report to Accompany the Definitive Draft Declaration of the International Rights and Duties of Man.”

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ninth International Conference of American States, Acta (Comision VI, 3a. Sesion, Doc. CB-287-c, c. VI-13), April 21, 1948, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. U.S., Department of State, Ninth International Conference of American States: Report of the Delegation of the United States with Related Documents, Washington, D.C., 1948, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  32. IAJC, First Draft of the Declaration, pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  35. For a summary of different positions on the matter see Vernon Van Dyke, Human Rights, the United States, and World Community ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1970 ), pp. 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  36. IACHR, The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: Its Powers, Functions, and Activities (OEA/Ser. L/V/II.22, Doc. 9 (English) ), August, 1969, pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., pp. 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  38. The Convention may be found in IACHR, Handbook of Existing Rules Pertaining to Human Rights (OEA/Ser. L/V/Ií.23, Doc. 21 ( English) Rev. ), December, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  39. IACHR, Comparative Study of the United Nations Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and the Draft Inter-American Convention on Human Rights (OEA/Ser. L/V/Ií.19, Doc. 18 (English)), 1968, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Inter-American Specialized Conference on Human Rights, Observations of the Governments of the Member States on the Draft Inter-American Convention on Protection of Human Rights: Chile (OEA/Ser. K/XVI/1.1, Doc. 7), November, 1969, p. 1. (Documents of this Conference hereafter cited as IASCHR, title, document number, and page.)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  42. IASCHR, Acta de la segunda sesion plenaria (resumida), Doc. 86, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thomas Buergenthal, “Commentary oil the American Convention on Human Rights: Illusions and Hopes,” Buffalo Law Review (Vol. 21, No. 1), 1971, pp. 128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., n. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Donald T. Fox, “Evolution of the American Convention on Human Rights and Prospects for its Ratification by the United States,” (unpublished, 1972), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  47. IACHR, Report on the Status of Human Rights in Chile (OEA/Ser. L/V/II.34, Doc. 21), October, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LeBlanc, L.J. (1977). Inter-American Obligations on Human Rights. In: The OAS and the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9514-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9514-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8695-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9514-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics