Abstract
It is with Hume’s arguments for the claim that “the rules of morality are not conclusions of our reason” that this chapter deals. We have already considered the support Hume offers for the contention that “reason, by itself, does not excite passions and produce or prevent actions.” I tried to show that Hume failed to establish this point. In this chapter we will be concerned with the first premise of Hume’s argument, namely, “moral judgments, rules, and precepts excite passions and produce or prevent actions.” It is only when this premise is understood that we come to understand how it is that Hume was led to hold the position that we cannot distinguish right from wrong or good from bad by means of reason.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1964 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broiles, R.D. (1964). Exciting and Justifying Reasons. In: The Moral Philosophy of David Hume. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9506-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9506-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8691-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9506-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive