Abstract
Neither of the two dominant models purporting to explain policy-making in the United States is applicable to the test ban treaty or to similar types of foreign and national security issues which are highly technical but which also stimulate considerable political activity.1 The pluralist model emphasizes group activity and the dispersal of power while the elite model focuses on the concentration of power in the hands of an interlocking clique who are not accountable to the public.2 Activity by individuals, groups, and the mass media does not indicate that the pluralist model is operating because these non-governmental participants may not penetrate the decision-making system. Nevertheless because linkages between nongovernmental participants and official decision-makers are difficult to locate, it is not logical to conclude that an elite necessarily decides all major issues.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Terchek, R.J. (1970). Conclusions. In: The Making of the Test Ban Treaty. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9502-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9502-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8689-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9502-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive