Advertisement

The Media and the Treaty

Chapter
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The mass media act as the major channel of information to the general public and to decision-makers as well. Although society and government have changed in many important respects since Jefferson’s time, his observation that a free press is the foundation of a democratic system is still appropriate. To the extent that government officials rely only on private or restricted-use channels to communicate selectively among one another, the general public becomes an irrelevant participant in the policy-making process, left only with the alternatives to approve or disapprove the actions of officials in toto at election time. When the mass media reports an event, they do not bestow on every citizen who follows the news the same power or information as the President or Senators. They give the individual information which may stimulate his interests and activity for or against a policy. In concert with other citizens, he may effectively set the appropriate boundary for a decision-maker.

Keywords

Foreign Policy Large Paper Small Paper Chicago Tribune Saturday Evening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V.O. Key, Public Opinion and American Democracy ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961 ), p. 405.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., and Bernard Cohen, The Press and Foreign Policy ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963 ), pp. 139–140.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    John W. Riley and Matilda W. Riley, “Mass Communication and the Social System,” in Robert Merton, et. al., eds. Sociology Today: Problems and Prospects ( New York: Basic Books, 1959 ), p. 544.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruce Westley and Werner Severin, “Some Correlates of Media Credibility,” Journalism Quarterly, 41 (Summer, 1964), pp. 328–29.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Carl I. Hovland, “Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived from Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change,” American Psychologist XIV (January, 1959), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Joseph T. Klapper, The Effects of Mass Communications (New York: The Free Press, 1960), p. 61Google Scholar
  7. Carl I. Hovland and W. Weiss “The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness,” Public Opinion Quarterly, XV (Winter, 1951 ), pp. 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernard Berelson, “Communications and Public Opinion,” in Wilbur Schram (ed.), Mass Communications ( Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1949 ), p. 500.Google Scholar
  9. For the effectiveness of the different types of media, see Sidney Kraus, et al.,“Mass Media and the Fallout Controversy,” Public Opinion Quarterly,Vol. XXVII (Summer, 1963), p. 197.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carl I. Hovland, “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Reactions to Communication and Attitude Change,” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, XIV (January, 1959 ), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Combined news judgments of editors responding to a survey as reported in the Columbia Journalism Review (Winter, 1964), p. 41.Google Scholar
  12. 46.
    See Alfred Hero for the relationship between opinions about civil rights and foreign affairs in the South in The Southerner and World Affairs (Baton Rouge, La.: Louisiana State University Press, 1965), pp. 409–10; 418.Google Scholar
  13. 48.
    H. S. Foster, “POS List of ‘Representative’ Newspapers vs. ’More Comprehensive Coverage,’ ” Public Opinion Studies Staff, Department of State, January 28, 1964 (Mimeographed), p. 3.Google Scholar
  14. 49.
    Eugene J. Rosi, “How 50 Periodicals and the Times Interpreted the Test Ban Controversy,” Journalism Quarterly, XLI (Autumn, 1964 ), p. 547.Google Scholar
  15. 59.
    Snell Putney and Russell Middleton, “Some Factors Associated with Student Acceptance or Rejection of War,” American Sociological Review, XXVII (October, 1962), p. 666.Google Scholar
  16. 53.
    We Must Face the Danger,“ Saturday Evening Post,235 (February 10, 1962), p. 36.Google Scholar
  17. 54.
    Cf. Key, op. cit.,pp. 364–366; and The Audiences of 5 Magazines,a survey sponsored by Newsweek and conducted by Audits and Surveys Company, 1962, p. 23.Google Scholar
  18. 57.
    Quoted in Americans for National Security and the Liberty Lobby, The Moscow Treaty ( Washington: Liberty Lobby, 1963 ), pp. 21–24.Google Scholar
  19. 58.
    Inserted by Senator Thurmond in the Congressional Record,September 10, 1963, pp. 15777–15778.Google Scholar
  20. 59.
    Federal Communications Commission, Report No. 4800, Public Notice B, September 19, 1963.Google Scholar
  21. 60.
    Committee on Foreign Relations, Hearings, The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty,87th Cong., 1st Sess., 1963, p. 772.Google Scholar
  22. 66.
    Material for this section is based on interviews conducted in Washington, D.C. March and April, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1970

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations