Skip to main content

Abstract

At various times we referred to the possibility of agreements within the United Nations. We are referring to agreements other than the conventions sponsored by the Assembly as part of its effort at the codification and progressive development of international law. Agreements which are the subject of this section are those which may find expression in the resolutions of the United Nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosenne, “United Nations Treaty Practice,” 86 Recueil des Cours 310 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  2. (1962) I.C.J. Rep. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Id., at 434. Cf. Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judge Fitzmaurice and Spender. They seem to reject idea of negotiation at the United Nations, (1962) I.C.J. Rep. 560-562.

    Google Scholar 

  4. (1952) I.C.J. Rep. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  5. (1951) I.C.J. Rep. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, “The Conclusions of International Conferences,” 35 Brit. Yb. Int’l L. 121 (1959); Sloan, “The Binding Force of a ‘Recommendation’ of the General Assembly of the United Nations,” 25 Brit. Yb. Int’l L. 23. Lauterpacht expressed the view that intention to be bound may be indicated by a vote for a resolution such as the one on Nurnberg principles. Lauterpacht, International Law and Human Rights 413 note 61 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.A. resolution 1752 (XVII), 21st Sept. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, “The Binding Force of League Resolutions,” 16 Brit. Yb. Int’l L. 158 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sloan, op. cit. supra note 6, at 22 n. 1; Rosenne, op. cit. supra note 1, at 319.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.C.I.J., Ser. A/B. No. 42 (1931), at 116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. (1947-8) I.C.J. Rep. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. (1950) I.C.J. Rep. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.C.I.J., Ser. A/B. No. 53 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.C.I.J., Ser. A/B. No. 46 (1932). Further examples can be found in Judge Jessup’s separate opinion in the South-West Africa Cases, (1962). I.C.J. Rep. 402-405.

    Google Scholar 

  15. (1962) I.C.J. Rep. 418.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McNair, The Law of Treaties 7–15 (1961). See also Separate Opinion of J essup in the South-West Africa Cases (1962) I.C.J. Rep. 401-404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1966 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asamoah, O.Y. (1966). Declarations as Agreements Within the United Nations System. In: The Legal Significance of the Declarations of the General Assembly of the United Nations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9495-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9495-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8685-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9495-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics