Skip to main content
  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

This term “self-identity” is a more or less idiomatic rendering of Augustine’s idipsum — literally, “it itself”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Phaedo, 78 D.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plato, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Commentary on Psalm CXXI, 5 (PL 37, 1622).

    Google Scholar 

  4. “Quid est ergo’ idipsum’ nisi quod est? Quid est quod est? Quod aeternum est. Nam quod semper aliter atque aliter est, non est quia non manet: non omnino non est, sed non summe est.” Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.g., Parmenides, 132 D; Phaedo, 101 C.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. Sophist, 256 A-259 C.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Republic, VI, 509 B.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Enneads, III, 8.8-9; V, 1.7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Enneads, V, 1.10; V, 2.1; V, 3.12; VI, 7.17.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Enneads, III, 8.10-11; V, 1.7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. Augustine, Commentary on Psalm CXXI, 5 (PL 37, 1622); The Trinity, III, 2.8 (PL 42, 842).

    Google Scholar 

  12. On the Christian Way of Life, I, 14.24 (PL 32, 1321).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See above, Chapter II.

    Google Scholar 

  14. “Viderunt isti philosophi [sc, Platonici] … nullum corpus esse Deum: et ideo cuncta corpora transcenderunt, quaerentes summum Deum. Viderunt quidquid mutabile est, non esse summum Deum; et ideo oranem animam mutabilisque omnes Spiritus transcenderunt, quaerentes summum Deum. Deinde viderunt omnem speciem in re quacumque mutabili, qua est quidquid illud est, quoque modo et qualiscumque natura est, non esse posse, nisi ab illo quid vere est, quia incommutabili-ter.” The City of God, VIII, 6 (PL 41, 231).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf. On Christian Doctrine, II, 12.17 (PL 34,43); The Trinity, XV, 2.2 (PL 12, 1057).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. Against Julian the Pelagian, IV, 14.72 (PL 44, 774).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Epistle CXXXVII, 4.15 (PL 33, 522).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Against Julian the Pelagian, loc. cit.; On the True Religion, V, 8 (PL 34, 126).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sermon VI, 3.4 (PL 38, 61).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sermon VII, 7.7 (PL 38, 66).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Above, Chapter IL

    Google Scholar 

  22. Above, Chapter III.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Commentary on Psalm CXXI, 5 (PL 37, 1672); cf. Confessions, XIII, 31.46 (PL 32, 865).

    Google Scholar 

  24. “Le Dieu d’Augustin est … le Dieu Chretien en ceci qu’il est l’Étre, mais la notion d’existence, caractéristique de Jehovah, est interprétée par lui c omme une sorte d’énergie d’immutabilité.” E. Gilson, Introduction à l’étude de Saint Augustin, 2nd ed., Paris, Vrin, 1943, p. 186, note 2; trans., L. Lynch, The Christian Philosophy of St. Augustine, New York: Random House, 1960, p. 313, note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cf. above, Chapter II, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  26. In idipsum quid ait, nisi quod mutari non potest? Caetera, quae sunt creata, aliter et aliter possunt esse; qui autem creavit, aliter et aliter non potest esse. Idipsum ergo ille est, quoniam dictum est ei: “Mutabis ea, et mutabuntur; tu autem idem ipse es, et anni tui non deficient” (Psalm 101: 27, 28). Igitur si ipse idem ipse est, mutari ex nulla parte potest …” Commentary on Psalm CXLVI, 11 (PL 37, 1906); cf. Commentary on Psalm CXXI, 5 (PL 37, 1622); CXXI, 6 (PL 37, 1623); CXLVI, 1 (PL 37, 1899), etc.; The Trinity, III, 2.8 (PL 42, 872).

    Google Scholar 

  27. On the Christian Way of Life, I, 14, 24 (PL 32, 1321).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Confessions, XIII, 31.46 (PL 32, 865). Of course, there are variant readings of this text; e.g., Ramorino has “… qui non aliquo modo est, sed quod est, est”. But in his latest edition (1962) Skutella follows the older and (I think) better version cited above. In any case Augustine’s meaning is perfectly clear: God exists not in some degree; He simply is.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prologue of Summa Theologiae, Part One.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid. Note St. Thomas’s frequent allusions to the order of our knowing in his introductory remarks to the Questions on God’s perfection and goodness, His infinity, His omnipresence and ubiquity, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cf. The Trinity, X, 5.7 (PL 42, 977); X, 9.12 (PL 42, 989); Confessions, X, 22.32 (PL 32, 795).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Berlinger, Augustins dialogische Metaphysik, Frankfurt am Main, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  33. The City of God, XI, 10.3 (PL 41, 327).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Commentary on Psalm CI, sermon 2, 10 (PL 37, 1311).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, J.F. (1965). Self-Identity. In: St. Augustine and being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9447-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9447-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8655-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9447-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics