Abstract
There is no science which is so in danger of creating a wrong picture through half truths as sociology. For this reason I wish to give some additional data — without thereby repudiating anything Prof. Wertheim wrote — which to my mind may influence the bearing of his theses and the interpretation of his statements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Prof. Wertheim is invited to come and consult about a few points with the scientific staff of the N.V. Philips’ Gloeilampenfabriek (Philips Light-bulb Factory and Co. Ltd) at Eindhoven, in the company of a physicist to be named by him.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1955 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagenvoort, H., Langemeijer, G.E., Samkalden, I. (1955). Remarks, Dr C. J. Dippel would have Wished to Make as a Debater with Regard to the Pre-Advice by Prof. W. F. Wertheim on “Aspects of Freedom and Restriction in Science”, if there had been Time. In: Freedom and Restriction in Science and its Aspects in Society. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9099-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9099-2_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8396-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9099-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive