Skip to main content

Summary of the Debate about Prof. A. G. M. van Melsen’s Pre-Advice about “The Responsibility of the Scientist”

  • Chapter
Freedom and Restriction in Science and its Aspects in Society
  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

Dr Dippel starts by stating that he agrees with the pre-advice in his first approximation to it. He also believes that in many cases it is sociologically demonstrable that the presence of incorruptible scientists has a benificial effect on society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1955 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dippel, C.J. (1955). Summary of the Debate about Prof. A. G. M. van Melsen’s Pre-Advice about “The Responsibility of the Scientist”. In: Freedom and Restriction in Science and its Aspects in Society. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9099-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9099-2_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8396-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9099-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics