Abstract
Schiller was born in 1759 in one of those tame bourgeois families that have so often cradled untamed genius. Growing up in a devout Pietist milieu, it was not unnatural that Schiller should plan to prepare himself for the ministry. However the Duke of Württemberg needed young intelligence for his growing school and forced Schiller’s father, an officer in Karl Eugen’s service, to enroll the boy in this institute. Thus at fourteen, young Johann Christoph Friedrich entered the Pflanzschule at the palace Solitude.
La liberté naturelle, qui n’a pour bornes que les forces de l’individu. Rousseau
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Karl Hoffmeister, Schillers Leben, 3rd ed. Stuttgart, 1858, p. 28.
Ibid., p. 29.
Hoffmeister, Op. cit. I, p. 176.
Benno von Wiese. Friedrich Schiller, Stuttgart, 1959, p. 11.
Introduction to “Die Räuber” in Schillers Werke, Berlin, 1907, Second volume, p. 29.
Ibid.. p. 29. It should be kept in mind that Schiller knew Rousseau’s work only partly and this evaluation does not do justice to Rousseau’s work as an entirety. See further Chap. 2. p. 25.
Schillers Werke, Horensausgabe, München, 1917 p. 363.
Richard Fester. Rousseau und die deutsche Geschichtsphilosophie. Stuttgart, 1890, p. 19.
Kuno Fischer, Schiller-Schriften, Heidelberg, 1891, p. 33.
Oeuvres complètes, Paris, 1871–77 I. p. 13.
Kuno Fischer, Op. cit., p. 23.
Werke, I. p. 193.
A. H. Vowinckel in his Schiller als Dichter der Geschichte sees Schiller entirely as a Kantian, thus failing to notice the characteristic antagonism of his philosophical premises.
Oskar Walzel, in the chapter on Deutsche Dichtung von Gottsched bis zur Gegenwart (Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft, Wildpark-Potsdam, 1927), notices this “Dreitakt” idea already in the poem Die Künstler of 1789. It was, of course to become more conspicuous later in the formula Natur-Kultur-gefühlte Natur. Compare also Johannes Thyssen, Geschichte der Geschichtsphilosophie. Bonn, 1954, 2nd ed. p. 42.
Hoffmeister, Op. cit., p. 40.
Quoted in Wiese, Op. cit., p. 25.
Lessings Werke, Leipzig, 1874, V. p. 380.
Op. cit. p. 41.
An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Dublin, 1776, p. 85.
Wiese, p. 78.
Ibid., p. 81.
Friedrich Meinecke, “Schiller und der Individualität sgedanke”, Werke, Stuttgart, 1959, Vol. IV.
Ferguson, Op. cit., p. 346.
Ibid. p. 380.
Ibid., p. 335.
Remarks on a Pamphlet lately Published by Dr. Price. London, 1776.
Maximen und Reflexionen, 1251, Goethes Werke, Berlin, Bong & Co. nd. v. XII, p. 161.
De l’Allemagne, Paris, 1959, II, p. 87.
“Contrat Social”, Oeuvres complètes, Vol. III, p. 306.
William Witte, “Law and Social order in Schiller’s thought”. In his Schiller and Burns and other Essays, Oxford, 1959, p. 68.
Werke, Vol. I, 363.
Ibid., I, 494.
Witte, p. 36. Allan L. Carter, in Parallel Themes and their Treatment in Schiller and Shaftesbury, Philadelphia, 1919, believes that little evidence can be traced of Schiller’s first-hand knowledge of Shaftesbury, and that the parallels in thinking must be based on similarities in character and temperament. (p. 12)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1965 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Regin, D. (1965). Rebels and Scholars. In: Freedom and Dignity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9097-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9097-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8395-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9097-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive