Abstract
1. Commenting on a passage of Husserl’s Cartesianische Meditationen Roman Ingarden has put the problem how one and the same Ego can be the constituting, pure Ego and the constituted real self at the same time. For Husserl had written that the phenomenological, meditating Ego could become the “impartial spectator” (unbeteiligter Zuschauer) of itself and, consequently, of all objectivity there is, in the way in which it is, for this Ego. For that reason, Husserl goes on to say, I am, in my quality of the natural self, also, and always, the transcendental Ego, although it is true that I do not realize this until I conduct the phenomenological reduction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1959 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Peursen, C. (1959). Some Remarks on the Ego in the Phenomenology of Husserl. In: For Roman Ingarden. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9086-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9086-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8389-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9086-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive