Abstract
Broadly speaking, the most-favoured-nation clause in international agreements is designed to ensure that each party will be treated on exactly the same footing as the most favoured third country. The clause is nothing more than the legal embodiment of a precaution against discriminatory treatment.1 States other than the promisor and beneficiary form the tertium comparationis. 2 Most-favoured-nation treatment does not demand compliance with any definite or objective rules of conduct. The rights which a state enjoys under the standard are the counterpart of the rights granted by the promisor to third States. In the absence of undertakings to third states the most-favoured-nation standard is an empty shell and βin operation, it is a shell with variable β and continuously varying β contents.β 3 Another basic characteristic of the clause is that it is not compatible with any discrimination on the part of the promisor against the beneficiary and in favour of third States.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Β© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hydert(hasan), K. (1968). Equality of Treatment vs. Discrimination in GATT: Article I(I). In: Equality of Treatment and Trade Discrimination in International Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9062-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9062-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8375-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9062-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive