Skip to main content

The Definition of Taxation

  • Chapter
Comparative Federalism

Abstract

The essential nature of a tax for the purposes of the constitutional law of the systems studied here consists in its being a compulsory exaction,1 enforceable by law, imposed under legislative authority, and made for a public purpose,2 the broad objective of which may be stated as being support of the processes of government.3 This does not necessarily connote only support of governmental institutions as such, although these are obviously included. Particular levies may, however, be earmarked for special purposes so that where a particular service provided by government is of both general interest to the community at large and of special interest to a segment of the community, the cost of providing it may be apportioned between the two interests;4 it is sufficient if the levy is paid into a public fund and is thereafter subject to appropriation in the same manner as public moneys generally.5 Thus the exaction should not be wrested from its setting and its governmental purpose ignored. Money may not be demanded from one group solely for the benefit of another;6 but if the exaction has a legitimating governmental objective of regulation, it is of no consequence that its proceeds are distributed amongst a limited segment of the community.7 Determination of the objective of a tax is a question to be decided by the courts.8

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parton v. Milk Board, 80 Commw. L.R. 229, 258 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawson v. Interior Tree Fruit and Vegetable Committee, [1931] Can. Sup. Ct. 357, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 61 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.-G. for British Columbia v. Esquimault and Nanaimo Ry. Co., [1950] A.C. 87, 121 (P.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steward Machine Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937); Parton v. Milk Board, supra, note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. United States v. Butler, supra, note 3; Citizens’ Saving and Loan Assoc, v. Topeka, 20 Wall. 655 (1875).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lower Mainland Dairy Products Sales Adjustment Committee v. Crystal Dairy Ltd., [1933] A.C. 168, 175 (P.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement District, 262 U.S. 710, 717 (1923); Atlantic Smoke Shops Ltd. v. Conlon, [1943] A.C. 550, 565 (P.C.); Waterhouse v. Deputy Federal Commissioner, 17 Commw. L.R. 665 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macallen Co. v. Massachusetts, 279 U.S. 620, 628 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.-G. for British Columbia v. Esquimault and Nanaimo Ry. Co., supra, note 4, [1950] A.C. at 115.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peterswald v. Bartley, 1 Commw. L.R. 497, 509 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.-G. for British Columbia v. Kingcome Navigation Co., [1934] A.C. 45, 59 (P.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D’Emden v. Pedder, 1 Commw. L.R. 91 (1904); A.-G. for British Columbia v. A.-G. for Canada (Customs Duty), [1924] A.C. 222 (P.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123 (1869), Brown v. Houston, 114 U.S. 622 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  15. These elements are however, fused into one, in Chief Justice Marshall’s judgment in Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 (1827). Vide supra, Chapter 3, page 26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Henneford v. Silas Mason Company, 300 U.S. 577, 586 (1937), per Cardozo J.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. v. Barger, 6 Commw. L.R. 41, 99 (1908).

    Google Scholar 

  18. In re Insurance Act of Canada, [1932] A.C. 41, 52 (P.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co., 259 U.S. 20, 43 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1964 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mackinnon, V.S. (1964). The Definition of Taxation. In: Comparative Federalism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8910-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8910-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-8910-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics