Skip to main content
  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

Adherence to the rules of the law has priority in the legal profession, as this quote from F. Lee Bailey reveals:

Let’s start with a hypothetical case. Two men, inmates in the same prison, write my office for help. Both have been convicted as participants in the same loan company holdup. The first man says he’s innocent. He was tucked in with his girlfriend at the time of the robbery, but the jury didn’t believe her. The second man doesn’t deny taking part in the crime, but complains that he was never told that as an indigent he had a right to free counsel. Jailhouse lawyers have told him this is a sufficient violation of rights afforded him by the Miranda decision to win him a new trial.

We write the first man: There is nothing we can do for you; innocence is not important once you’re in the can. But we tell the second man he has a sixty-forty chance of winning a new trial. He writes back to say that’s fine, and that a relative will be in with a retainer. “By the way,” he adds, referring to the robber, “the other guy who wrote you wasn’t there. I know, because I was.” The revelation won’t change anything. [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, F. The Defense Never Rests. Stein and Day, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Waltz, J., and Inbau, F. Medical Jurisprudence. Macmillan, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curran, W. Malpractice claims. New data and trends. N. Engl. J. Med. 300: 26–27 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Slovenko, R. Psychiatry and Law. Little, Brown, Boston (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz, W., and Kamesar, N. Doctors, damages and deterrence. N. Engl. 3. Med. 298: 1282–1290 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Spectrum Publications

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sierles, F. (1982). Forensic Medicine. In: Sierles, F. (eds) Clinical Behavioral Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7973-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7973-7_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7975-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7973-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics