Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in the Study of Birth Defects ((ASBD,volume 6))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

Significant clinical implications are associated with uterine anomalies. This subject has stimulated interest, debate and controversy over the past 300 years, especially as to the clinical implications of each anomaly. Depending upon the type of anomaly present, varied clinical presentations of hazardous obstetric and gynaecological complications are encountered. The incidence of uterine anomalies (both major and minor) has been reported from a low of 1 in 4000 deliveries to as high as 12% of different obstetric populations studied. However, as the majority are minor abnormalities, they are usually undetected. The least marked deviation from normal is the uterus arcuatus, which is the most common and the most frequently overlooked. Infertility patients have been found to have a higher than expected incidence (4 %) of significantly abnormal uteri. The usual incidence of anomalies is approximately 0.6%, whenever there is a high index of clinical suspicions1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Green, L. K. and Harris, R. E. (1976). Uterine anomalies, frequency of diagnosis and associated obstetrics complications. Obstet. Gynecol., 47, 427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Polishuk, W. Z. and Ron, M. A. (1974). Familial bicornuate and double uterus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 119, 982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiersma, A. F., Peterson, L. F., and Justema E. J. (1976). Uterine anomalies associated with unilateral renal agenesis. Obstet. Gynecol., 47, 654

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Strassman, E. O. (1966). Fertility and unification of double uterus. Fertil. Steril., 17, 165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farber, M. and Mitchell, G. W. Jr. (1979). Bicornuate uterus and partial atresia of the fallopian tube. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 134, 881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jarcho, J. (1946). Malformations of the uterus. Am. J. Surg., 71, 106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, W. S. (1957). Obstetric significance of female genital anomalies. Obstet. Gynecol., 10, 113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Semmens, J. P. (1962). Congenital anomalies of female genital tract: Functional classification based on review of 56 personal cases and 500 reported cases. Obstet. Gynecol., 19, 328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buttram, V. C. Jr. and Gibbons, W. E. (1979). Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil. Steril., 32, 40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Semmens, J. P. (1965). Abdominal contour in the third trimester-an aid to diagnosis of uterine anomalies. Obstet. Gynecol., 25, 779

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Young, O. H. and Gibson, M. (1980). Unicornis uterus with a normal external uterine surface. Fertil. Steril., 33, 663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nickerson, C. W. (1977). Infertility and uterine contour. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 129, 268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buttram, V. C. Jr., Zanotti, L., Acosta, A. A., Vanderheyden, J. S., Besch, P. K. and Franklin, R. R. (1974). Surgical correction of the septate uterus. Fertil. Steril., 25, 373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Musich, J. R. and Behrman, S. J. (1978). Obstetric outcome before and after metroplasty in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet. Gynecol., 52, 63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiebe, D. (1970). Retained placenta of unusual type. Obstet. Gynecol., 35, 153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohn, F. L. and Goldenburg, R. L. (1976). Term pregnancy in an unattached rudimentary uterine horn. Obstet. Gynecol., 48, 234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jarrell, J., Effer, S. B. and Mohide, P. T. (1977). Pregnancy in rudimentary horn with fetal salvage. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 127, 676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johansen, K. (1969). Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn. Two case reports. Obstet. Gynecol., 34, 805

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Szlachter, N. and Weiss, G. (1979). Distal tubal pregnancy in a patient with a bicornuate uterus and segmental absence of the fallopian tube. Fertil. Steril., 32, 602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pelosi, M. A., Langer, A., Li, T. S., Zanvettor, J. and Cortes, R. (1977). Failed termination of pregnancy due to uterus bicornis unicollis with bilateral pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 128, 919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McArdle, C. R. (1978). Failed abortion in a septate uterus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 131, 910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Loendersloot, E. W. (1977). Twin pregnancy in double uterus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 127, 682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rolen, A. C., Choquette, A. J. and Semmens, J. P. (1966). Rudimentary uterine horn. Obstetric and gynecologic implications. Obstet. Gynecol, 27, 806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Neves-E-Castro, M., Saavedra, A. B. E., Vilhena, M. M. and Jones, H. W. Jr. (1976). Lateral communicating double uterus with unilateral vaginal obstruction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 125, 865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaufman, R. H., Binder, G. L., Gray, P. M. and Adam, E. (1977). Upper genital tract changes associated with exposure in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 128, 51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haney, A. F., Hammond, C. B., Soules, M. R. and Creasman, W. T. (1979). DES induced upper genital tract abnormalities. Fertil. Steril, 31, 142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pillsbury, S. G. Jr. (1980). Reproductive significance of changes in the endometrial cavity associated with exposure in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 137, 178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Behnam, K. (1980). Congenital malformations and carcinoma. Female Patient, 5, 42

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gerbie, M. V. and Weingold, A. B. (1966). Cervical carcinoma in an anomalous cervix. Obstet, Gynecol, 27, 168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wall, R. L. Jr. (1958). Didelphic uterus with carcinoma in situ both cervices. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 76, 803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Duncan, A. S. and John, A. H. (1962). Endometrial carcinoma occurring in the uterus bicornis. J. Obstet, Gynecol Br. Commonw., 69, 488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

T. V. N. Persaud M. P. Persaud

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, R.E. (1982). Uterine anomalies: clinical significance. In: Persaud, T.V.N., Persaud, M.P. (eds) Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Malformations. Advances in the Study of Birth Defects, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7956-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7956-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7958-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7956-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics