Skip to main content
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

The rise of our modern historical consciousness or historicism has long been the subject of careful analysis and study.1 Most scholars agree that it arose in Germany in the first half of the nineteenth century and that it constituted a definite reaction to the Enlightenment’s emphasis upon universal, immutable, and all-sovereign natural law. Where Voltaire and Turgot were convinced that the general rather than the particular was the chief concern of historical investigation — “ ‘The core is always the same’ ” as Voltaire stated — men like Herder, Hegel, and Ranke placed great stress upon the concreteness and particularity of individual historical phenomena. Moreover, in direct opposition to Voltaire’s interest in “ ‘that great society of all-wise men which exists everywhere and which is everywhere independent,’ ”2 they emphasized the importance of the various national units and their unique and peculiar historical development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Among the better studies are those of Friedrich Meinecke, Die Entstehung des Historismus, 2 Vols, (Munich and Berlin: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1936). Friedrich Engel-Janosi, The Growth of German Historicism (“The Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Sciences,” Vol. LXII; Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1944). R. G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (New York: Galaxy Books, 1956). G. G. Iggers, The German Conception of History, (Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quoted in Engel-Janosi, op cit., pp. 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (2nd ed. Tübingen: Mohr, 1965) pp. 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedrich Nietzsche, “Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie für das Leben” in Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen (Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner, 1955) pp. 95–195.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacob Burckhardt, Force and Freedom: an Interpretation of History ed. by James H. Nichols (New York: Meridian Books, 1955) pp. 60–61. Also see Benedetto Croce’s comments on Burckhardt in his History as the Story of Liberty, Tr. by Sylvia Sprigge (New York: Meridian Books, 1955) pp. 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collingwood, op. cit., p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  8. As Kant in his Critique of Pure Reason attempted to reestablish and justify the methodology of the natural sciences, so Dilthey initially regarded it as his task to develop a methodological foundation for the cultural sciences. L. Landgrebe, Major Problems in Contemporary European Philosophy, Tr. by K. F. Reinhardt (New York: F. Ungar, 1966) p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in Gadamer, op. cit., p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Landgrebe, op. cit., pp. 108–109.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rather the structures of life are interpreted by means of the “categories of life” which are only accessible to a special “understanding psychology” which alone probes the full context of inner experiences. Ibid., p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., pp. 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graf Paul York von Wartburg, Bewusstseinsstellung und Geschichte (Tübingen: M. Niemeyer, 1956). For Heidegger see below.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. P. Rickman, editor, Meaning in History, W. Dilthey’s Thoughts on History and Society. (London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1961) p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Misch, Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie (Leipzig: Teubner, 1929). Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gadamer, op. cit., p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ernst Troeltsch, “Die Krisis des Historismus,” Neue Rundschau, XXXIII (1922), pp. 572–590. Also his Der Historismus und seine Probleme (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck] 1922). Further works indicative of the “crisis” character of historicism in the post World War I period are: Theodore Lessing, Geschichte als Sinngebung des Sinnlosen (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1921); Benedetto Croce, “Antihistorismus,” Historische Zeitschrift CXLIII (1931), pp. 457–466; and Karl Heussi, Die Krisis des Historismus (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck], 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. G. Iggers, “The Dissolution of German Historicism,” ed. by R. Herr and H. T. Parker in Ideas in History (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1965), pp. 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For Husserl’s specific objections to historicism see his essay “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft” Logos I (1910), pp. 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Arendt, “What is Existenz Philosophy” Partisan Review XIII (1946), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roman Ingarden, “Kritische Bemerkungen zu Husserl,” ed. by S. Strasser in Husserliana (2nd ed. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1963), I, pp. 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (10th ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1963). The first edition appeared in the Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, VIII, (1927), pp. 1–438. See also below chapter I.

    Google Scholar 

  24. An excellent source of biographical information on Löwith is his inaugural address to the Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. See “Antrittsrede” in Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Jahresheft (1958/ 59), pp. 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See A. Levison’s introduction to K. Löwith, Nature, History, Existentialism and Other Essays in the Philosophy of History. “Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy,” (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966) p. XVI. G. H. Nadel’s comments in History and Theory, II (1962), p. 297. H. Lubasz’s review of K. Löwith’s Gesammelte Abhandlungen, in History and Theory, II (1962), p. 217. J. Habermass, “Karl Löwith’s stoischer Rückzug vom historischen Bewusstsein,” Merkur, XVII, (1963), pp. 576–590. For similar judgments consult H. Ott. “Neuere Publikationen zum Problem von Geschichte und Geschichtlichkeit” Theologische Rundschau, XXI (1953), pp. 63–95. R. Boehm, “Karl Löwith und das Problem der Geschichtsphilosophie,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, X (1956), pp. 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Riesterer, B.P. (1969). Introduction. In: Karl Löwith’s View of History: A Critical Appraisal of Historicism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7837-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7837-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7839-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7837-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics