Abstract
Kant’s efforts to discover the philosophical presuppositions of taste in the Critique of Judgment have been described as being designed to crown the total intellectual structure of his philosophical system.1 That his concern with matters of taste was prompted by a greater interest in intellectual architectonics than in the practical problems of aesthetics is not to be denied. But the historical influence of this his crowning effort has extended beyond the rarified atmosphere of system building and has found its way into the analysis of aesthetic experience.2 This poses a problem as to the evaluation of Kant’s Critique. Is Kant’s interpretation of taste to be dismissed as an empty though convenient philosophical construct or is it to be granted some status as possessing insight with respect to aesthetic experience? In such an evaluation of Kant’s contributions to aesthetics the question arises of whether the aesthetic experience retains its relative independence in the Kantian analysis or whether the aesthetic is subjugated to the intellectual or the moral. A consideration of the relationship between the aesthetic and the intellectual is particularly important since Kant approaches the theory of beauty through an interpretation of cognition. This approach has led many interpreters to hold that Kant’s theory of aesthetics is through and through intellectualistic. The contention of the present essay is that for Kant the aesthetic experiences are not only not intellectual but must be wholly distinguished from cognitive experiences. The difficulty of interpretation arises, however, because the language Kant uses to develop his theory is intellectualistic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gilbert, Katherine and Kuhn, Helmut, A History of Esthetics ( New York, The Macmillan Company, 1939 ) p. 323.
The influence of Kant’s aesthetics can be detected in the work of many later thinkers. Santayana’s Sense of Beauty,for example, shows marked Kantian influence.
Introduction to the Critique of Judgment Bernard’s translation, pp. 17–18.
The Critique of Judgment,Bernard’s translation, p. 66. Kant distinguishes the aesthetic from the moral on the basis that it pleases without desire. It is the distinction from the intellectual which is particularly problematic.
Cf. Lee, H. N.. “Kant’s Theory of Aesthetics,” Philosophical Review, Vol. XL, No. 6, Nov., 1931.
The Critique of Judgment, Bernard’s translation, p. 55.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1964 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, L.N. (1964). Notes on the Judgment of Taste. In: A Symposium on Kant. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7493-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7493-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0277-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7493-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive