Abstract
The history of philosophy is cumulative. Every fresh point of view may be considered an advance provided it is sufficiently comprehensive. And each in its turn must be fitted in a larger scheme.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kant’s Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics,translated by Paul Carus (Chicago 1933, Open Court), p. 12. All references to this work (hereinafter Pro.) will be to this edition.
Critique of Pure Reason,A 314. All references to this work (herein-after CPR) will be to the translation by Norman Kemp Smith (London 1933, Macmillan).
Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals,Preface, first paragraph.
CPR,B 9, A 61, B 86, B 371–2.
In CPR, the Appendix on the Amphiboly of Concepts of Reflection, especially in B 316–336.
See also CPR,A 86 and B 119.
To complete the critique of pure reason, judgment, which mediates between reason and understanding, is required. See for instance the Critique of Teleological Judgment trans. T. C. Meredith (Oxford 1928, Clarendon Press), p. 4.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1964 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feibleman, J.K. (1964). Kant and Metaphysics. In: A Symposium on Kant. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7493-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7493-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0277-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7493-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive