Skip to main content

Two Logics of Modality

  • Chapter
A Symposium on Kant

Part of the book series: Tulane Studies in Philosophy ((TUSP,volume 3))

  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

Only a few paragraphs before presenting the ‘pure conVicepts of the understanding’ by means of the familiar Table of Categories, Kant considers the ‘logical function of thought in judgment’ in a similar fashion, concluding that this function may be “brought under four heads, each of which contains three moments.”1 The fourth of these heads, as presented in the Table of Judgments, is:1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Critique of Pure Reason,Transcendental Analytic, Bk. I, Ch. I, Sec. 2, §9; (A70, B95). [In Norman Kemp Smith’s Translation (Humanities Press, 1950), p. 106 ff.]

    Google Scholar 

  2. loc. cit., “4”. A74–6, B99–101, NKS109–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I refrain purposely from using symbols for the logical connectives here; they are not being analysed, and are better kept separate from the modalities at this point.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Part of this observation must be drawn from his discussion of the disjunctive judgment in the paragraph just preceeding that on modality. A74, B99, NKS 109.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Transc. Anal., Bk. I., Ch. I, Sec. 3, 10. A80, B106, NKS 113.

    Google Scholar 

  6. in loc. cit. A82, B108, NKS 115.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ibid. B110, NKS 116.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ibid. B111, NKS 116.

    Google Scholar 

  9. This (Kantian) use of ‘contingency’ is consistent with the selective emphasis employed both in common sense and technical usage whereby we indicate ’that which (is but) might not be.’

    Google Scholar 

  10. op. cit., A218, B265, NKS 239 (Transc. Anal., Bk. II, Ch. II., Sec. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  11. cf. op. cit. A231, B283, NKS 250.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A219, B266, NKS 239.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A233–4, B286, NKS 251–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1964 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barber, R.L. (1964). Two Logics of Modality. In: A Symposium on Kant. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7493-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7493-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0277-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7493-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics