Skip to main content

Opposition to nuclear power

  • Chapter
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the promise of nuclear power in providing a clean, safe and reliable source of power for the foreseeable future there are in many countries delays and hesitations in accepting this new source of energy. These are due in a large measure to the hostility of part of the public to any nuclear developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BEIR Committee, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Taylor, “Proof of Evidence on Behalf of the Political Economy Research Group”, Windscale Inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, US Congress, January 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Patterson, “Transcript of Proceedings: Day 53”, Windscale Inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WHO Technical Report Series,No. 151 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Francis, A History of the British Railways - Its Social Relations and Revelations, 1851.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Eliott, Middlemarch, 1872, Chapter 56.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Marcuse, One Dimensional Man, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Futures,8 (No. 1), (February 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Tubiana, Colloquium on the Psycho-Sociological Implications of the Nuclear Industry, Paris, January 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Tubiana, Revue Generale Nucleaire, No. 5 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoyle, Energy or Extinction, Heinemann Educational Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vassily Yemelianov, USSR Academy of Sciences, quoted in Eastern Business Magazine, 1977, p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.B. Lovins, “Energy Strategy. The Road Not Taken”, Foreign Affairs, (October 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lord Beaumont of Whitley, “The Green Alliance”, letter in Financial Times, 4 October 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Davoll, letter to Atom, No. 264 (October 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Burke, letter to Vole, October 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Cotgrove, letter in The Times, 27 November 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Report on Conference for a Non-nuclear Future, Salzburg, April 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.B.C. Taccoen, “Movements Anti-nucleaires, Opinion Publique et Politique en France”, IAEA-CN-36/FR 255.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A.B. Lovins, Conference for a Non-nuclear Future, Salzburg, April 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Touraine, New Society, 8 November 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Marsh, “The New Matrix of Political Action”, Futures, April 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Graham and Trotman Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenhalgh, G. (1980). Opposition to nuclear power. In: The Necessity for Nuclear Power. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7350-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7350-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-86010-249-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7350-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics