Abstract
Medical students are given the impression that patients are affected by a disease. And a disease is thought to have an independent reality. As Pickering (1962) says1 ‘We have grown accustomed to defining a disease, and ultimately to ascribing it, to a unique and specific fault with a unique and specific cause’. Although we all realize how difficult it can be to reach a diagnosis, we may still take it for granted that, if only we were more knowledgeable and more clever, we could still attach some neat diagnostic label to every patient. When faced by a patient who has defied all the efforts of mortal man, we may perhaps assume that the Almighty would know which particular disease was responsible for the illness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pickering, G.W. (1962). Lancet, 1, 1298
Bottazzo, G.E. and others. (1978). Br. Med. J., 2, 253
Hart, F.D. (1972). Br. Med. J., 2, 621
Huskisson, E.G. and others. (1977). Br. Med. J., 2, 1459
Leading article (1977). Br. Med. J., 2, 976
Newman, P.H. (1973). J. Bone J. Surg., 55B, 7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 J.W. Todd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Todd, J.W. (1981). The Nature of Maladies. In: The State of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7245-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7245-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7247-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7245-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive