Skip to main content

Abstract

Prior to 1967, the discharge properties of peripheral receptors, both vertebrate and invertebrate, had been examined and described in great detail. But one great weakness of all of this work was that the data had been obtained in immobile, usually anaesthetised animals. While this was not seen as a serious impediment to the understanding of the role of “passive” receptors, such as those in mammalian skin, it was clearly unsatisfactory for receptors whose sensitivities were under the control of efferents from the CNS (e.g.muscle spindles).Theories of motor control had tended to be built partly on what was known of segmental reflex organisation, and partly on the presumed behaviour of proprioceptors under natural conditions (e.g. Lundberg, 1969).Indeed to some extent the theories stood or fell, depending on the accuracy of these guesses regarding normal afferent activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appenteng, K. & Prochazka, A. (1984). Tendon organ firing during active muscle lengthening in awake, normally behaving cats. J. Physiol., 353, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarac, F., Libersat, F. & Zill, S. (1985). Single mechanoreceptor afferent units firing during locomotion in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas). J. Physiol, (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, M.R. & Taylor, A. (1967). Behaviour of jaw muscle stretch receptors during active and passive movements in the cat. Nature, Lond., 220, 301–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagbarth, K.E. & Vallbo, A.B. (1967). Afferent responses to mechanical stimulation of muscle receptors in man. Acta Soc Med. Upsal., 72, 102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, G.E. (1980). Somatosensory unit input to the spinal cord during normal walking. Can. J. Physiol. & Pharmacol., 59, 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, A. (1969). Reflex control of stepping. The Nansen Memorial Lecture V. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P.B.C. (1972). Mammalian Muscle Receptors and their Central Actions. Arnold, London, pp, 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka, A. (1981). Muscle spindle function during normal movement. In International Review of Physiology, Vol 25, Neurophysiology, IV. Ed. Porter, R. Universiby Park Press, Baltimore, pp 47–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severin, F.V., Orlovsky, G.N. & Shik, M.L. (1967). Work of the muscle receptors during controlled locomotion. Biophysics, 12, 575–586.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 W.J.P. Barnes and M.H. Gladden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prochazka, A. (1985). Introduction. In: Barnes, W.J.P., Gladden, M.H. (eds) Feedback and Motor Control in Invertebrates and Vertebrates. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7084-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7084-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7086-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7084-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics