Skip to main content

An extensionist environmental ethic

  • Chapter
Ecologists and Ethical Judgements

Abstract

Environmental ethics consists of a set of competing theories about whether human actions and attitudes to nature are morally right or wrong. Ecocentrists are holists whose theory locates the primary site of value in biological communities or ecosystems and who tend to regard actions interfering with the progress of an ecosystem toward its mature equilibrium state as prima facie wrong. I suggest that this form of ecocentrism may be built on a questionable scientific foundation, organismic ecology, and that a better scientific foundation for environmental ethics may be found in individualistic neo-Darwinian population biology. However, the latter approach probably requires a corresponding shift away from ethical holism and toward approaches locating value primarily in individuals. I call such environmental ethicists ‘extensionists’ and briefly outline an extensionist environmental ethic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attfield, R. (1983) The Ethics of Environmental Concern. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentham, J. (1948) The Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cahen, H. (1988) Against the moral considerability of ecosystems. Environ. Ethics 10, 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callicott, J.B. (1988) Animal liberation and environmental ethics: back together again. Between the Species 4, 163–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Callicott, J.B. (1988) Inquiry 35, 183–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Callicott, J.B. (1989) In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Callicott, J.B. (1992) Aldo Leopold’s metaphor. In Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management ( R. Costanza, B.G. Norton and B.D. Haskell, eds.). Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Comstock, G. (1988) How not to attack animal rights from an environmental perspective. Between the Species 4, 177–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Comstock G. (1992a) Pigs and piety: a theocentric perspective on food animals. Between the Species 8, 121–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Comstock, G. (1992b) Should we genetically engineer hogs? Between the Species 8, 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Comstock, G. (1992c) The moral irrelevance of autonomy. Between the Species 8, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Comstock, G. (1995) Do agriculturalists need a new, an ecocentric, ethic? Agriculture and Human Values,in press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Costanza, R., Norton, B.G., and Haskell, B.D. eds. (1992) Ecosystem Health: New Goals For Environmental Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frankena, W.K. (1979) Ethics and the environment. In Ethics and Problems of the 21st Century. ( K.E. Goodpaster and K.M. Sayre, eds.) pp. 3–20. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hettinger, N. and Throop, B. (1994) Can ecocentric ethics withstand chaos in ecology? Unpublished manuscript, quoted with permission.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, L.E. (1991) A Morally Deep World: An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leopold, A. (1966) A Sand County Almanac With Essays on Conservation from Round River. New York: Ballantine. (Originally published by Oxford University Press in 1949 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Norton, B.G. (1986) The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Norton, B.G. (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Neill, J. (1992) The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist 75, 119–37.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, J. (1984) Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue With Nature. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Regan, D.H. (1986) Duties of preservation. In The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity ( B.G. Norton, ed.) pp. 195–220. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Regan, T. (1983) The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rolston, H. (1988) Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Russow, L.M. (1981) Why do species matter? Environ. Ethics 3, 101–12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sapontzis, S.F. (1987) Morals, Reason, and Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singer, P. (1975) Animal Liberation. New York: A New York Review Book, distributed by Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sober, E. (1986). Philosophical problems for environmentalism. In The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity ( B.G. Norton, ed.) pp. 173–94. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Steverson, B.K. (1994) Ecocentrism and ecological modeling. Environ. Ethics 16.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sylvan R. (1973) Is there a need for a new, an environmental ethic? Proceedings of the XV World congress of philosophy, No. 1, pp. 205–10. Varna, Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor, P. (1986) Respect For Nature: a Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. VanDeVeer, D. (1994) Interspecific justice. In The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book (D. VanDeVeer and C. Pierce, eds.) Wadsworth: Belmont, CA. (Reprinted from Inquiry 22, VanDeVeer ( 1979 ) 55–70 ).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Varner, G. (1990) Biological functions and biological interests. Southern J. Phil. 28, 251–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Varner, G. (1993) A critique of environmental holism. In In Nature’s Interest? Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. Unpublished manuscript, quoted with permission.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Warren, K.J. (1990) The power and promise of ecological feminism. Environ. Ethics 12, 125–46.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Worster, D. (1985) Nature’s Economy: a History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zimmerman, M.E., ed. (1993) Environmental Philsophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Chapman & Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Comstock, G.L. (1996). An extensionist environmental ethic. In: Cooper, N.S., Carling, R.C.J. (eds) Ecologists and Ethical Judgements. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6965-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6965-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-70980-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6965-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics