Abstract
Environmental ethics consists of a set of competing theories about whether human actions and attitudes to nature are morally right or wrong. Ecocentrists are holists whose theory locates the primary site of value in biological communities or ecosystems and who tend to regard actions interfering with the progress of an ecosystem toward its mature equilibrium state as prima facie wrong. I suggest that this form of ecocentrism may be built on a questionable scientific foundation, organismic ecology, and that a better scientific foundation for environmental ethics may be found in individualistic neo-Darwinian population biology. However, the latter approach probably requires a corresponding shift away from ethical holism and toward approaches locating value primarily in individuals. I call such environmental ethicists ‘extensionists’ and briefly outline an extensionist environmental ethic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Attfield, R. (1983) The Ethics of Environmental Concern. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bentham, J. (1948) The Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner Press.
Cahen, H. (1988) Against the moral considerability of ecosystems. Environ. Ethics 10, 195–216.
Callicott, J.B. (1988) Animal liberation and environmental ethics: back together again. Between the Species 4, 163–9.
Callicott, J.B. (1988) Inquiry 35, 183–98.
Callicott, J.B. (1989) In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Callicott, J.B. (1992) Aldo Leopold’s metaphor. In Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management ( R. Costanza, B.G. Norton and B.D. Haskell, eds.). Washington DC: Island Press.
Comstock, G. (1988) How not to attack animal rights from an environmental perspective. Between the Species 4, 177–8.
Comstock G. (1992a) Pigs and piety: a theocentric perspective on food animals. Between the Species 8, 121–35.
Comstock, G. (1992b) Should we genetically engineer hogs? Between the Species 8, 196–202.
Comstock, G. (1992c) The moral irrelevance of autonomy. Between the Species 8, 15–27.
Comstock, G. (1995) Do agriculturalists need a new, an ecocentric, ethic? Agriculture and Human Values,in press.
Costanza, R., Norton, B.G., and Haskell, B.D. eds. (1992) Ecosystem Health: New Goals For Environmental Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Frankena, W.K. (1979) Ethics and the environment. In Ethics and Problems of the 21st Century. ( K.E. Goodpaster and K.M. Sayre, eds.) pp. 3–20. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hettinger, N. and Throop, B. (1994) Can ecocentric ethics withstand chaos in ecology? Unpublished manuscript, quoted with permission.
Johnson, L.E. (1991) A Morally Deep World: An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leopold, A. (1966) A Sand County Almanac With Essays on Conservation from Round River. New York: Ballantine. (Originally published by Oxford University Press in 1949 ).
Norton, B.G. (1986) The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Norton, B.G. (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Neill, J. (1992) The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist 75, 119–37.
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, J. (1984) Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue With Nature. New York: Bantam.
Regan, D.H. (1986) Duties of preservation. In The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity ( B.G. Norton, ed.) pp. 195–220. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Regan, T. (1983) The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rolston, H. (1988) Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Russow, L.M. (1981) Why do species matter? Environ. Ethics 3, 101–12.
Sapontzis, S.F. (1987) Morals, Reason, and Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Singer, P. (1975) Animal Liberation. New York: A New York Review Book, distributed by Random House.
Sober, E. (1986). Philosophical problems for environmentalism. In The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity ( B.G. Norton, ed.) pp. 173–94. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Steverson, B.K. (1994) Ecocentrism and ecological modeling. Environ. Ethics 16.
Sylvan R. (1973) Is there a need for a new, an environmental ethic? Proceedings of the XV World congress of philosophy, No. 1, pp. 205–10. Varna, Bulgaria.
Taylor, P. (1986) Respect For Nature: a Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
VanDeVeer, D. (1994) Interspecific justice. In The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book (D. VanDeVeer and C. Pierce, eds.) Wadsworth: Belmont, CA. (Reprinted from Inquiry 22, VanDeVeer ( 1979 ) 55–70 ).
Varner, G. (1990) Biological functions and biological interests. Southern J. Phil. 28, 251–70.
Varner, G. (1993) A critique of environmental holism. In In Nature’s Interest? Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. Unpublished manuscript, quoted with permission.
Warren, K.J. (1990) The power and promise of ecological feminism. Environ. Ethics 12, 125–46.
Worster, D. (1985) Nature’s Economy: a History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, M.E., ed. (1993) Environmental Philsophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Chapman & Hall
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Comstock, G.L. (1996). An extensionist environmental ethic. In: Cooper, N.S., Carling, R.C.J. (eds) Ecologists and Ethical Judgements. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6965-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6965-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-70980-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6965-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive