Skip to main content

Science and Technology Policies of Small OECD Economies

  • Chapter
Science and Technology Policy
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

Having considered the science policies of some of the larger economies, let us now look at the policies of a sample of industrialized countries with smaller economies. On the whole these economies are more dependent on foreign trade and technology than are the larger economies. For example a comparison of imports as a percentage of GDP (compare Tables 5.2 and 4.2) show that on average these are higher for the small economies under consideration. The review will help answer the following questions: Are S & T policies different in the small economies from those in the large? Are the priorities of the small economies different? Is there a tendency to be more explicit about S & T priorities in small economies? Do the small economies tend to adopt different mechanisms for co-ordinating and directing their S & T policy? For example, do they take advantage of their small size to more often co-ordinate or centrally direct their science policy? Do these countries use their smaller size to increase public participation in the setting of goals for S & T policy given their highly dependent status in the world? To what extent do their priorities reflect common world-wide trends?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

Belgium

  1. K redietbank (1978), Science policy in Belgium, Weekly Bulletin (March 17 ), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kredietbank (see ref. 1) pp. 2, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Schuuring, C. (1977), The Netherlands and Belgium, in: Science and Government Report International Almanac 1977 (ed. D.S. Greenberg), Science and Government Report Inc. Washington, pp. 63–68, particularly p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schuuring, C. (see ref. 3) p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  5. OECD (1978), Science and Technology Policy Outlook,Paris, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See for instance OECD (1975), The Aims and Instruments of Industrial Policy: A Comparative Study,Paris, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  7. OECD (see ref. 6) p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kredietbank (see ref. 1) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Le rôle de l’industrie en matière de politique scientifique, Science Technique (1979), 1st February (4), pp. 437–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See ref. 9; based on the figures in Table 2, pp. 442

    Google Scholar 

  11. For some international comparisons of industrial R & D including Belgium see OECD (1977/78), Science Resources Newsletter (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kredietbank (see ref. 1) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

Canada

  1. OECD (see ref. 5) p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ministry of State for Science and Technology (1978), Federal Science Activities 1978-79,Canada, pp. 62, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MOSST (see ref. 14) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MOSST (see ref. 14) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan, J. (Minister of State for Science and Technology) (1978), Support for industrial research announced by the Honourable Judd Buchanan, Press Release, June 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchanan, J. (1978), Measures to strengthen and encourage research and development in Canada, Notes for an Address to the House of Commons, June 1, and ‘Highlights’ paper tabled.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Department of Supply and Services provides funds on behalf of other government departments and agencies wishing to contract out research.

    Google Scholar 

  8. This in part is a flow-on from a report by the Science Council of Canada. See Science Council of Canada (1975), Technology Transfer: Government Laboratories to Manufacturing Industry, Report No. 24, Information Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buchanan, J. (see ref. 18) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For an outline of these see MOSST (ref. 14) pp. 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buchanan, J. (see ref. 17) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Senate Special Committee on Science Policy (Chairman: Honourable Maurice Lamontagne) (1972), A Science Policy for Canada: Target and Strategies for the Seventies,Vol. 2, Canada; and (1973), A Science Policy for Canada: Government Organization for the Seventies,Vol. 3, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

The Netherlands

  1. OECD (1978) Policies for the Stimulation of Industrial Innovation,Vol. II-2, Part 8, Paris, p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Minister for Science Policy, (1979), Science Policy in the Netherlands: 1979 Science Budget Summary, Information Department, Ministry of Education and Science, The Hague, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Minister for Science Policy, (1978), 1978 Netherlands Science Budget: Summary,The Hague, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See ref. 26, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See ref. 26, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Minister for Science Policy (1978), Sector Councils for Science Policy: Memorandum, Ministry of Education and Science, The Hague, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See ref. 26 p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Commencing 1979, the Ministry of Science Policy is to publish a magazine, Science Policy in the Netherlands five times a year to provide up-to-date information on Dutch science policy. For a comparatively recent in-depth study of science policy in the Netherlands see Planning and Development in the Netherlands, (1976) 7 ( 2 ), Van Gorcum Ltd., Assen. This periodical is published by the Netherlands Universities Foundation for International Co-operation and this issue is entirely devoted to Science Policy in the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Sweden

  1. The Swedish Institute (1978), Research planning and organization in Sweden, Fact Sheets on Sweden, (July) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See ref. 33, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The National Swedish Board for Technical Development: Task-Activities-Structure, (1978), STU, Stockholm, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Swedish Government Commission on the Organization of Research Councils (1975), Research Councils in Sweden: Proposals for New Organization,Stockholm, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. STU (see ref. 35) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. STU (see ref. 35) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. STU (see ref. 35) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Swedish Institute (see ref. 33) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Swedish Institute (see ref. 33) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Swedish Institute (see ref. 33) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Swedish Institute (see ref. 33) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Some further references on public administration of R & D in Sweden are: Nordfosk, Scandinavian Research Guide and OECD (1978), Policies for the Stimulation of Industrial Innovation,Vol. II-2, Part 9, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Switzerland

  1. OECD (1971), Reviews of National Science Policy: Switzerland,Paris, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD (see ref. 45) p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  3. OECD (see ref. 45) p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  4. OECD (see ref. 45) p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  5. OECD (see ref. 45) p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  6. OECD (see ref. 5) p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trueb, L.F. (1977), Switzerland in ref. 3, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. OECD (see ref. 45) p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See The OECD Observer (1979), (97, March) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. OECD (see ref. 5) p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See 1976 figure for Switzerland in ref. 5 p. 36. These figures can for instance be compared with the 1975 figures in OECD (1977), Science Resources Newsletter,(2, Spring) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. OECD (see ref. 45) pp. 200, 201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 C. A. Tisdell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tisdell, C.A. (1981). Science and Technology Policies of Small OECD Economies. In: Science and Technology Policy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6932-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6932-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-6934-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6932-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics