Abstract
Although physics is an exact science, the pointer readings of the physicist’s instruments do not give the exact values of the quantities measured. All measurements in physics and in science generally are inaccurate in some degree, so that what is sometimes called the “accurate” value or the “actual” value of a physical quantity, such as a length, a time interval or a temperature, cannot be found. However, it seems reasonable to assume that the “accurate” value exists, and we shall be concerned to estimate limits between which this value lies. The closer these limits the more accurate the measurement. In short, as the “accurate” value is denied us, we shall endeavour to show how the “most accurate” value indicated by a set of measurements can be found, and how its accuracy can be estimated.
“And so we see that the poetry fades out of the problem, and by the time the serious application of exact science begins we are left with only pointer readings.”
Eddington
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1972 J. Topping
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Topping, J. (1972). Errors of Observation. In: Errors of Observation and their Treatment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6928-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6928-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-21040-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6928-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive