Skip to main content

Family allowances and minimum income

  • Conference paper
  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most difficult issues in the area of social policy is to define a ‘poverty line’ — an income level that can be expressed in cash terms below which it is argued that the citizens of any given country should not fall. [1] Even if such a definition can be found which is broadly acceptable, the means adopted for trying to ensure that people do not fall below the poverty line are going to be extremely complex. Yet clearly one of the challenges facing those whose task it is to develop social policy — particularly in a time of economic depression — is to devise satisfactory means of ensuring that all members of society have the basic income resources available to them with which they can obtain the basic necessities of life: food, housing, heating, clothing, education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, the theoretical discussion of definitions of ‘poverty’, in P. Townsend, ‘Poverty in the United Kingdom’, Penguin Books, 1979, Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See now the extremely useful survey by J. Bradshaw and D. Piachaud, ‘Child Support in the European Community’, (Occasional Papers on Social Administration No. 66), (Bedford Square Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. There is a useful introductions to these in the ‘European Industrial Relations Report’, No. 92 (1981) pp. 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I received copies of National Reports from the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Eederal Republic of Germany, France, Greece, Italy, Norway, Spain and Sweden. I am most grateful to the National Reporters from the above countries for their helpful and interesting contributions. Information about the United Kingdom is based on my own personal knowledge of the social security system.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In particular Norway and to a lesser extent Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For example, it is suggested in the Austrian report (p. 15) that far greater changes in social security may be anticipated in the future, but that, at present, such considerations are a matter of secrecy; see too the Danish national report.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This point emerges particularly strongly in the French National Report. In Spain, a major review of family policy measures is being conducted; a Report was due to be published on 31 January 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For example, Belgium, Spain, France, (pre May 1981), Denmark. This is also the case in the United Kingdom, Bradshaw and Piachaud, op. cit., p. 95; see too D. Piachaud, ‘The Cost of a Child’, (Child Poverty Action Group, 1980). 9. German report.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Austrian report, see further below.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Norvegian and Swedish report.

    Google Scholar 

  11. French report.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Austrian report.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Swedish report. This was also a consideration in French planning policy during the period of the 8th Economic Plan.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swedish report.

    Google Scholar 

  15. French report; see too the measures developing in Spain, mentioned in the Spanish report.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Austrian report.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Austrian report.

    Google Scholar 

  18. French report.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spanish and Belgian report.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For example, United Kingdom and France, see too special protection of orphans and children of prisoners mentioned in the Danish report.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For example, France and Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  22. This section is based on the EIRR survey, cited above note 3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Some of these methods of subsidy has been discussed in the Family Allowances section of this paper; see also, e.g. the British Family Income Supplement scheme.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Greece is one example.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Certainly in Great Britain this is a closely guarded official secret.

    Google Scholar 

  26. For example, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  27. French report.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See, e.g., S. Rottenberg,’ Economics of Legal Minimum Wages, (Washington, DC, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Partington, M. (1984). Family allowances and minimum income. In: The social security and the economic crisis II Proceedings of the European Institute for Social Security / La sécurité sociale et la crise économique II Travaux de l’Institut Européen de Sécurité Sociale. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6825-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6825-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-6544-199-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6825-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics