Abstract
The praise of the autonomy of science seems to be something so laudable it barely needs defense. This is the sign of rapidly changing times. for, it was only in the forties, as I well remember, that the defense of planned science, i.e. government regulated and controlled science, was no less in the vogue, and was taken for granted not only by left-wing scientists. Michael Polanyi is by now one of the best known philosophers of science. He began his philosophical career when he attacked the theory of planned science during World War II, when he was a well-known scientist. He began his defense of the autonomy of science arguing from the autonomy of the scientist, and he ended by denying this autonomy. I wish to argue that Polanyi’s progress is logical enough: you cannot have it both ways.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agassi, J. (1981). The Autonomy of Science. In: Science and Society. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6456-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6456-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-6458-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6456-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive