Effects of Educational Intervention Programs on the Cognitive Development of Young Children



Nearly 50 years after the first systematic studies of the effects of educational programs on the intellectual development of young children there is still debate on whether such programs are useful. For the most part, the argument has narrowed to the preschool population, especially the toddler group, and to children known to be developmentally disabled.


Intervention Program Birth Certificate Intellectual Development School Failure Stimulation Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bayley, N. Development of mental abilities, in Mussen, P.H. (ed.), Carmichaels Manual of Child Psychology (3d ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons (1970).Google Scholar
  2. Haskins, R., Finkelstein, N. and Stedman, D. Infant-stimulation programs and their effects. Ped. Ann., 7:123–144 (1978).Google Scholar
  3. Haskins, R., Ramey, C., Stedman, D., Blacher-Dixon, J. and Pierce, J. Effects of repeated assessment on standardized test performance by infants,Am. J. Ment. Defic., Vol. 83, No. 3:233–239 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Heber, R., Dever, R. and Conry, J. The influence of environmental and genetic variables on intellectual development, in Prehm, H., Homerlynck, L. and Crosson, J. (eds.), Behavioral Research in Mental Retardation. Eugene: University of Oregon Press (1968).Google Scholar
  5. Jensen, A.R. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39:1–123 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. Ramey, C., Stedman, D., Borders-Patterson, A. and Mengel, W. Predicting school failure from information available at birth. Am. J. Ment. Def., Vol. 82, No. 6:525–534 (1978).Google Scholar
  7. Ramey, C., Farran, D. and Campbell, F. Predicting IQ from mother-child interactions. Child Devel., 50:804–814 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ramey, C. and Campbell, F. Educattonal intervention for children at risk for mild retardation: A longitudinal analysis, in P. Mittler (ed.), Frontiers of Knowledge in Mental Retardation (vol. 1). Baltimore: University Park Press (1981).Google Scholar
  9. Ramey, C. and Haskins, R. The modification of intelligence through early experience. Intelligence, 5:5–19 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, A.C., Flick, G.L., Ferriss, G.S. and Sellmann, A.H. Prediction of developmental outcome at seven years from prenatal, perinatal and postnatal events. Child Devel, 43:495–507 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stedman, D. and Eichorn, D. A comparative study of growth and development trends of institutionalized and noninstitutionalized mongoloid infants. Am. J. Ment. Defic, 69:391–400 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Stedman, D., Anastasiow, N., Dokecki, P., Gordon, I. and Parker, R. How can effective early intervention programs be delivered to potentially retarded children? DHEW Report OS-72–205, USGPO, October (1972).Google Scholar
  13. Stedman, D. Important considerations in the review and evaluation of educational intervention programs. Viewpoints, Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University, Vol. 52, No. 4, July (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Spectrum Publications, Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations