Skip to main content

A Culture-Free Intelligence Test I

  • Chapter
Book cover The Measurement of Intelligence

Abstract

Psychologists dealing with the application of intelligence tests seem to pass through alternating phases of uncritical overconfidence and cynical despair with regard to the validity of their measurements. To judge by recent utterances the fashionable phase at the moment is disillusionment; the tests do not measure any constant characteristic of the individual, and no two tests measure the same thing.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lorimer, F. and Osborn, F.: Dynamics of Population. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cattell, Raymond B.: “Some Changes in Social life in a Community with a Falling Intelligence Quotient.” The British Journal of Psychology, Vol. XXVIII, 1938, pp. 430–450.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neff, W. S.: “Socio-economic Status and Intelligence: a Critical Survey.” Penological Bulletin, Vol. XXXV, No. 10, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neff, W. S.: “Socio-economic Status and Intelligence: a Critical Survey.” Penological Bulletin, Vol. XXXV, No. 10, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klineberg, O.: Race Differences.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cattell, Raymond B.: “ Measurement Versus Intuition in Applied Psychology.” Character and Personality, Vol. vl, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cattell, Raymond B.: A Guide to Mental Testing] 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander, W. P.: “Intelligence, Concrete and Abstract.” Brit. Journ. Psych. Monograph Supplement, No. 19, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  9. El Koussy, A. A. H.: “The Visual Perception of Space.” Brit. Journ. Psych. Monograph Supplement, No. 20, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reports 1–9 of the Spearman-Holzinger Unitary Trait Study. Psychology Department, University of Chicago, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cattell, R. B.: “Temperament Tests. II Tests.” Brit. Journ. Psych., Vol. XIV, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cattell, R. B.: A Guide to Mental Testing, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burt, C.: “The Latent Revision of the Binet Intelligence Test.” Eugenics Renew, Vol. XXX, No. 4, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  14. With the same frankness as to the untenability of his position, Burt admits that no two editors of the Binet agree about the order of mental age items. He continues, “The second ‘Paper Cutting Test,’ which Terman assigns to the third or highest level of ‘Superior Adults’ we find can be done at age fourteen” whilst “Giving similarities between three things” is at the eleventh and fourteenth-year-old levels in America and Britain respectively.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cattell, R. B. and Bristol, H.: “Intelligence Tests for Mental Ages of Four to Eight Years.” Brit. Journ. Ed. Psych., Vol. in, No. II, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spearman, C.: “The New Stanford Revision of the Binet.” The Human Factor, Vol. XI, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freeman, F. N., Holzinger, E. J., and Newman, H. H.: Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Furfey, P. H., and Muhlenbeim, J.: “The Validity of Infant Intelligence Tests.” Journ. Genetic Psych., Vol. XL, 1932, pp. 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yet this test happens to be the basis for a widely repeated conclusion that the “intelligence” of nursery-school children has no relation to the intelligence or social status of the parents.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cox, J. W.: Manual Dexterity, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Porteufl, S. D.: The Psychology of a Primitive People, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Porteufl, S. D.: Primitive Intelligence and Environment, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davey, C. M.: “A Comparison of Group Verbal and Pictorial Tests of Intelligence.” Brit. Journ. Psych., Vol. XVII, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Line, W.: “The Growth of Visual Perception in Children.” Brit. Journ. Psych. Monograph Supplement, No. 15, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fortes, M.: A New Application of the Theory of Noegenesis to the Problem of Mental Testing. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of London library.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stephenson, W.: “Tetrad Differences for Non-verbal Subtests.” Journ. Educ. Psych., Vol. xxn, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stephenson, W.: “Tetrad Differences for Non-verbal and Verbal Tests.” Journ. Educ. Psych., Vol. xxn, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spearman, C.: The Spearman Visual Perception Test, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arsenian, Seth: “The Spearman Visual Perception Test (Part I). With Pantomime Direction.” Brit. Journ. Educ Psych., Vol. VII, 1937, pp. 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dorge, I., and Arsenian, S.: “A Comparison of the Scores of the Spearman Visual Perception Test, Part I, Administered by Verbal and Pantomime Directions.” Journ. Educ Psych., 1938, pp. 520–522.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reports 1–9 of the Spearman-Holsinger Unitary Trait Study. Psych. Dept., University of Chicago, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spearman, C.: Abilities of Man, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Penrose, L. F., and Raven, J. C.: “A New Series of Perceptual Tests: Preliminary Communication.” Brit. Journ. Medical Psyck., Vol. XVI, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Portais, S. D.: Primitive Intelligence and Environment, 1937, p. 237; “it is also susceptible to practice improvement.”

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Vernon, P. E.: “Intelligence Test Sophistication.” Brit. Journ. Educ. Psych., Vol. VIII, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spearman, C.: Abilities of Man, 1927, Chap. XIV.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thorndike, E. L.: “Tests of Intelligence, Reliability, Significance, Susceptibility to Special Training, and Adaption to the General Nature of the Task,” School and Society, Vol. IX, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Porteus, S. D.: Primitive Intelligence and Environment, 1937.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Line, W.: “The Growth of Visual Perception in Children.” Brit. Jours. Psych. Monograph Supplement, No. 15, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spearman, C.: The Spearman Visual Perception Test, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Penrose, L. F., and Raven, J. G.: “A New Series of Perceptual Tests: Preliminary Communication.” Brit. Journ. Medical Psych., Vol. XVI, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Spearman, C.: Abilities of Man, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spearman, C.: “Intelligence Tests.” Eugenies Review, Vol. XXX, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  44. El Koussy, A. H.: “A Note on the Greys Analogy Test.” Brit. Journ. Educ. Psych., Vol. IV, 1938, p. 294.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Porteus, S. D.: The Psychology of a Primitive People, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Klineberg, O.: “Racial Differences in Speed and Accuracy.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. XXII, pp. 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  47. In the research quoted (Cattell and Bristol, “Intelligence Tests for Mental Ages of Four to Eight Years”) the writers experimented with food (candy) in puzzle boxes for children of four to eight years. The correlations were no better than for tests done under “please the experimenter” motivation.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wild, E. H.: “Influence of Conation upon Cognition; Part II.” Brit. Journ. Psych., Vol. XVIII, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 H. J. Eysenck

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cattell, R.B. (1973). A Culture-Free Intelligence Test I. In: The Measurement of Intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6129-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6129-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-6131-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6129-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics