Abstract
Relations between the state and the farmer are currently the stuff of news headlines. There is an emerging public consciousness that, apart from the nationalised industries, agriculture is the most highly regulated and state supported sector of the economy. Concern has been heightened with the realisation that government involvement has had considerable implications for the organisation and structure of farming, for the welfare of rural communities, for the ecology of the countryside, for the price and availability of food, for nutritional standards, and for international trading relationships.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Body, R. 1982. Agriculture: the triumph and the shame. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
Body, R. 1984. Farming in the clouds. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
Bouquet, M. 1985. Family, servants and visitors: the farm household in nineteenth and twentieth century Devon. Norwich: Geo Books.
Bowers, J. K. and Cheshire, P. 1983. Agriculture, the countryside and land use. London: Methuen.
Donham, D. L. 1981. Beyond the domestic mode of production. Man 16, 515–541.
Durrenberger, E. P. (ed) 1984. Chayanov, peasants and economic anthropology. Orlando Florida: Academic Press.
Friedmann, H. 1978. Simple commodity production and wage labour in the American plains. J. Peas. Stud. 6, 71–100.
Friedmann, H. 1980. Household production and the national economy: concepts for the analysis of agrarian formations. J. Peas. Stud. 7, 158–184.
Friedmann, H. 1986a. The family farm in advanced capitalism: outline of a theory of simple commodity production in agriculture. In The political economy of agriculture in advanced industrial societies, F. H. Buttel and T. Murphy (eds). New York: University Press of America.
Friedmann, H. forthcoming 1986b. Patriarchy and property: a reply to Goodman and Redclift. Sociologia Ruralis 26.
Gasson, R. 1971. Use of sociology in agricultural economics. J. Agric. Econ. 22, 28–38.
Grahl, J. 1979. Econometric methods in macroeconomics: a critical appraisal. In Issues in political economy, F. Green and P. Nore (eds), 3–32. London: Macmillan.
Hollis, M. and Nell, E. (eds) 1975. Rational economic man: a philosophical critique of neo-classical economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopkins, R. F. and Puchala, D. J. (eds) 1978. The global political economy of food. Madison, W I: University of Wisconsin Press.
House of Lords 1984. Agriculture and the environment. 20th Report. Session 1983–84. Select Committee on the European Communities. London: HMSO.
Howarth, R. 1985. Farming for farmers? London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Marsden, T. 1984. Capitalist farming and the farm family: a case study. Sociology 18, 205–224.
Newby, H. 1979. Green and pleasant land? Social change in rural England. London: Hutchinson.
Newby, H. 1980. Rural sociology - a trend report. Current Sociology 28, 1–141.
Newby, H. 1982. Rural sociology and its relevance to the agricultural economist, a review. J. Agric. Econ. 33, 125–165.
Newby, H. 1983. The sociology of agriculture: towards a new rural sociology. Annual. Rev. Sociol. 9, 67–81.
Nou, J. 1967. The development of agricultural economics in Europe. Uppsala.
Shoard, M. 1980. The theft of thè countryside. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 P. Lowe, G. Cox and M. Winter and contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cox, G., Lowe, P., Winter, M. (1986). The state and the farmer: perspectives on agricultural policy. In: Cox, G., Lowe, P., Winter, M. (eds) Agriculture: People and Policies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5962-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5962-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-5964-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5962-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive