Skip to main content

Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 65))

Abstract

In this paper the term pair-list reading will be applied to both types (1) and (2)

  1. (1)

    Who did every dog bite?

    ‘For every dog, who did it bite?’

  2. (2)

    Who did six dogs bite?

    ‘For six dogs of your choice, who did each bite?’

This paper is a revision of sections 1 through 3 of my paper in the proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium; section 4 of that paper is developed in ‘Strategies for scope taking’ (this volume). This research was partially supported by NSF grant #SBR 9222501.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barker, Chris, and David Dowty (Eds.). 1992. Antecedent Contained Deletion in a Variable Free Semantics, Columbus. The Ohio State University.The Ohi State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo. 1996. The syntax of distributivity and pair-list questions. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo, Dorit Ben-Shalom, and Anna Szabolcsi. 1996. Variation, distributivity, and the illusion of branching. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo, and Tim Stowell. 1994. The direction of quantifier movement. GLOW Newsletter 32:56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Stephan. 1990. Towards the semantics of open sentences: Wh-phrases and indefinites. In Martin Stokhof and Leen Torenvliet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Amsterdam Colloquium, 53–79. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 1992. Functional WH and weak crossover. In Dawn Bates (Ed.), The Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 75–90, Stanford. CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 1993. Questions with quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 1(2):181–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doetjes, Jenny. 1993. Wide and independent scope in Wh-questions. Columbus, Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doetjes, Jenny, and Martin Honcoop. 1996. On event-relatedness, symmetry and weak islands. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet. 1985. Constituent Questions. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Donka. 1996. Evaluation indices and scope. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2):175–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1989. Type-shifting rules and the semantics of interrogatives. In Gennaro Chierchia et al. (Eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, Volume 2: Semantic Issues, 21–68. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1993. Interrogatives and adverbs of quantification. In Katalin Bimbó and András Maté (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Logic and Language, 1–29. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez Rexach, Javier. 1996. Questions and generalized quantifiers. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haïk, Isabelle. 1984. Indirect binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15(2):185–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, Herman. 1993. Studied Flexibility. PhD thesis, University of Ams- terdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James. 1991. Interrogatives I. In Lisa Cheng and Hamida Demirdash (Eds.), More Papers on WH-Movement (MIT WPL 15), 47–76, Cambridge. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James. 1993. Interrogatives. In Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20, 195–228. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James, and Robert May. 1981. Questions, quantifiers and crossing. Linguistic Review 1(1):41–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans, and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1):3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri, and Stanley Peters. 1980. Interrogative quantifiers. In Christian Rohrer (Ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification, 181–206. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1991. Definite Noun-Phrases are not quantifiers. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2):156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, Utpal. 1991. Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed Them. PhD thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike. 1992. Coordination and Comparatives. PhD thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike, and Anna Szabolcsi. 1994. Scope interactions with pair-list quantifiers. In Mercé González (Ed.), NELS 24: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Volume Two, 381–395. GLSA Publications, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard. 1974. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary english. In Richmond H. Thomason (Ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, 247–270. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsat, Stanley. 1986. Wh-complementizers. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(2):191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scha, Remko. 1981. Distributive, collective, and cumulative quantification. In Jeroen Groenendijk et al. (Eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, 483–512. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Barry. 1993. Plurals and Events. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, Gila. 1991. The Bounds of Logic. A Generalized Viewpoint. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastav, Veneeta. 1992. Two types of universal terms in questions. In NELS 22: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 443–457. GLSA Publications, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, Julie. 1993. Quantifiers and Wh-phrases in matrix and embedded clauses. Columbus, Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. Focussing properties, or the trap of first order. Theoretical Linguistics 10(2/3):125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1996. Strategies for scope taking. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna, and Frans Zwarts. 1993. Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking. Natural Language Semantics 1(3):235–284. Reprinted in this volume.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szabolcsi, A. (1997). Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings. In: Szabolcsi, A. (eds) Ways of Scope Taking. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5814-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5814-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4451-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5814-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics