Skip to main content

Computing Quantifier Scope

  • Chapter
Ways of Scope Taking

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 65))

Abstract

There is a quantifier scope ambiguity in (1). In addition to the preferred normal scope reading paraphrased in (1ns), this sentence has the inverse scope reading paraphrased in (1is):

  1. (1)

    Some linguist speaks every language.

    • (1ns) There is some linguist x such that x speaks every language

    • (1is) For every language y, there is some linguist or other who speaks y

Liu (1990) and others point out that certain objects, such as those with de-creasing denotations, do not allow an inverse scope reading, as in:

  1. (2)

    Some linguist speaks at most 2 languages.

    • (2ns) Some linguist x is such that x speaks at most 2 languages

    • (2is) There are at most 2 languages y such that some linguist or other speaks those 2 languages y

(2is) is perfectly intelligible: it says that linguists speak at most 2 languages altogether. This does not seem to be available as an interpretation of (2). This is arguably not just a preference; sentence (2) just cannot be interpreted as (2is).

This work was inspired by stimulating discussions with Anna Szabolcsi, Filippo Beghelli, Fernando Pereira, and especially Dorit Ben-Shalom and Ed Keenan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alechina, Natasha. 1995. Modal Quantifiers. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo, and Tim Stowell. 1996. Distributivity and negation. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shalom, Dorit. 1993. Object wide scope and semantic trees. In Procs. of the Workshop on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, SALT III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shalom, Dorit. 1996. Semantic Trees. PhD thesis, UCLA. Available at http://128.97.8.34/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Michael. 1995. Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995a. Language and nature. Mind 104:1–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995b. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.6

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin. 1983. Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Mary, John Lamping, Fernando Pereira, and Vijay Saraswat. 1994. A deductive account of quantification in LFG. In M. Kanazawa, C.J. Piñón, and H. de Swart (Eds.), Quantifiers, Deduction and Context. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael. 1993. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1995. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, Robert. 1992. Logics of time and computation. Stanford: CSLI/Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James, and Robert May. 1981. Questions, quantifiers and crossing. The Linguistic Review 1:41–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward L. 1987. Unreducible n-ary quantifiers in natural language. In P. Gardenfors (Ed.), Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward L., and Edward P. Stabler. 1994. Abstract syntax. In Configurations, Université du Quebec à Montreal. Forthcoming. Available at http://128.97.8.34/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda. 1994. Licensing heads. In David Lightfoot and Norbert Hornstein (Eds.), Verb Movement, 261–296. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Feng-hsi. 1990. Scope Dependency in English and Chinese. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, Seungho. 1991. Scope interpretation in nonconstituent coordination. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, WCCFL 10, 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Fernando C.N. 1990. Categorial semantics and scoping. Computational Linguistics 16:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique. 1995. Sketch of a reductionist approach to syntactic variation and dependencies. In Hector Campos and Paula Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabler, Edward P. 1996. Acquiring and parsing languages with movement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Forthcoming. Draft available at http://128.97.8.34/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1996. Strategies for scope taking. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stabler, E.P. (1997). Computing Quantifier Scope. In: Szabolcsi, A. (eds) Ways of Scope Taking. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5814-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5814-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4451-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5814-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics