Abstract
The principle of subsidiarity through its re-affirmation in the Treaty of Maastricht became an integral and central part of European constitutional law. Its relationship to ecological issues, however, has so far not been explored. Subsidiarity is a general principle of organization. It can apply to all areas of policy: financial, agricultural, technological, education, defense, economic development and, e.g. environmental policy. The principle of subsidiarity is silent about the specific purpose, direction or content of a particular policy.
Whatever be the purpose of any such policy, the principle of subsidiarity requires that it be carried out within that context which is the smallest viable one in which the objective can successfully be attained. When a task is too complicated for a small unit such as an office or a firm to be successfully performed, that unit has to be augmanted to the point where the task can be effectively performed. Likewise, if an organization is too large to successfully handle particular problems as its procedure may be too cumbersome or as it lacks sufficient detailed information or experience repeated recurrences of problems it has tried to settle, then a different organizational form must be found, preferably an existing one, which is closer to the problem at hand and able to carry out the policy. With the shift in responsibility will also travel the access to resources with which to carry out the task.
Since ecological units rarely co-incide with political units, the principle of subsidiarity poses a specific challenge to politicians and administrators who have to decide on assignments of tasks and responsibilities as well as funding within the different echelons and among the different Member States of the European Union.
This essay explores those tasks and, in particular, advances the notion of establishing ecological tax units.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Backhaus, J. (1988). Justitiabele Bedarfsprüfung im Genehmigungsverfahren: Ein Lüneburger Vorschlag. In J. Finsinger und J. Simon (Eds.) Recht und Risiko, 96–112. München: VVF.
Backhaus, J. (1991). “Henry George and the Environment”, Journal of the History of Economics Thought, Spring 13(1): 90–98.
Backhaus, J. and Krabbe, J.J. (1991). Henry George’s contribution to modern environmental policy: Part One: Theoretical postulates. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 50(4): 485–501.
Backhaus, J. and Krabbe, J.J. (1992). Henry George’s contribution to modern environmental policy: Part Two: An application to industrial siting. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 51(1): 115–127
Furubotn, E. (1979). Property in land historically considered. 4 July.
George, H. (1880). Progress and poverty. New York: D. Appleton $ Co. January.
Herzog, R. (1963). Subsidiaritätsprinzip und Staatsverfassung. Der Staat, 3: 339–423. 400 pp.
Mohl, R. von (1844)2, Die Polizeiwissenschaft nach dem Grundsätzen des Rechtsstates, 265–266. Tübingen: Publisher.
Vaubel, R. (1993). Das Sozialpolitische Abkommen von Maastricht widerspricht dem Subsidiaritätsprinzip. Universität Mannheim, 23, and 24 April.
Vaubel, R. (in press). A public-choice view of the Delors Report. In R. Vaubel and T.D. Willet (Eds.), The political economy of international organizations: A public choice approach, 306–310. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wolff, Chr. (1754). Grundsätze des Natur-und Völkerrechts, III, 2.1. Halle: Renger.
Zirnstein, G. (1994). Ecology and the environment in history (Ökologie und Umwelt in der Geschichte). Marburg: Metropolis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Backhaus, J.G. (1997). Subsidiarity and ecologically based taxation: A European constitutional perspective. In: Rowley, C.K. (eds) Constitutional Political Economy in a Public Choice Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5728-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5728-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6416-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5728-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive