Skip to main content

From the Duhem Thesis to the Neurath Principle

  • Chapter
Austrian Philosophy Past and Present

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 190))

Abstract

We owe to Professor Haller the forceful reminder that the common habit of designating a central plank of post-positivist philosophy of science, the “Duhem-Quine Thesis”, misses out a most important “positivist” link. To rectify the situation Haller coined the expression the “Neurath Principle”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • N. Cartwright, J. Cat, K. Fleck, T. E. Uebel, in press, Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Kerre, 1906, La Theorie Physique: Son Object Sa Structure, 2nd ed. 1914, transl. by P. Wiener The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, 1954, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2nd ed. 1962, New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Philipp, 1941, “Introduction: Historical Background”, in Frank, Between Physics and Philosophy, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Philipp, 1949, “Historical Introduction”, in Frank, Modern Science and its Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, Donald, 1993, Philosophy of Science in the 20th Century, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Rudolf, 1977, “Über Otto Neurath”, transl. “On Otto Neurath” in Uebel 1991, pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Rudolf, 1979, “Geschichte und wissenschaftliches System bei Otto Neurath”, transl. ”History and the System of Science in Otto Neurath” in Uebel 1991, pp. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Rudolf, 1982, “Das Neurath-Prinzip”, transl. “The Neurath Principle: Its Grounds and Consequences” in Uebel 1991, pp. 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Rudolf, 1985, “Der erste Wiener Kreis”, transl. “The First Vienna Circle” in Uebel 1991, pp. 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Rudolf, 1993, Neopositivismus, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, Ernst, 1883, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung, Leipzig: Brockhaus, 4th ed. transl. by T.J. McCormick The Science of Mechanics, 2nd ed. 1902, Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1910a, “Zur Theorie der Soziarwissenschaften”, Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 34, pp. 37–67, repr. in Neurath 1981, pp. 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1913a, “Probleme der Kriegswirtsehaftslehre”, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 69, pp. 438–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1913b, “Die Verirrten des Cartesius und das Auxiliarmotiv (Zur Psychologie des Entschlusses)”, Jahrbuch der Philosophischen Gesellschaft an der Universität zu Wien 1913, pp. 45–59, repr. in Neurath 1981, pp. 57–67, transl. “The Lost Wanderers and the Auxiliary Motive (On the Psychology of Decision)” in Neurath 1983, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1934, “Radikaler Physikalismus und ‘wirkliche Welt’”, Erkenntnis 4, pp. 346–362, repr. in Neurath 1981, pp. 611–624, transl. “Radical Physicalism and ‘the Real World’” in Neurath 1983, pp. 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1941a, “Universal Jargon and Terminology”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 41, pp. 127–148, repr. in Neurath 1983, pp. 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1941b, “The Danger of Careless Terminology”, New Era 22, pp. 145–150, transi. “Die Gefahr sorgloser Terminologie” in Neurath 1981, pp. 919–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1981, Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften, ed. by R. Haller & H. Rutte, Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto, 1983, Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, ed. and transl. by Robert S. Cohen & Marie Neurath, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O., 1951, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, Philosophical Review 60, pp. 20–43, repr. in Quine, From a Logical Point of View, 1953, rev. ed. 1980, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg, 1890, Über sociale Differenzierung. Sociologische und psychologische Untersuchungen, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, repr. in Simmel 1989, pp. 109–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg, 1898, “Die Selbsterhaltung der socialen Gruppe. Sociologische Studie”, [Schmoller’s] Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Rechtspflege des Deutschen Reiches 22, p. 589–640, repr. in Simmel, Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, 1894–1900, ed. by H.-J. Dahme & D. P. Frisby, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1992, pp. 311–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg, 1908, Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, repr. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg, 1989, Aufsätze 1887–1890. Über sociale Differenzierung. Die Probleme der Geschichtsphilosophie, ed. by H.-J. Dahme, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, Ferdinand, 1887, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag, 8th ed. 1935, transl. C. P. Loomis Fundamental Concepts of Sociology, New York: American Book Company, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, Ferdinand, 1899–1900, “Philosophical Terminology”, Mind 8, pp. 289–332, 467–491, 9, pp. 46–61, transl. Mrs. Bosanquet, German orig. Philosophische Terminologie in psychologisch-soziologischer Ansicht, Leipzig, 1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, Ferdinand, 1907, Das Wesen der Soziologie, Dresden: Zahn & Jaensch, repr. in Tönnies Soziologische Studien und Kritiken. Erste Sammlung, Jena: Fischer, 1925, pp. 350ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uebel, Thomas E., 1991a, ed., Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle. Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uebel, Thomas E., 1992, Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within, Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin, J., 1979, “On Duhem’s and Quine’s Theses”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 9, pp. 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uebel, T.E. (1997). From the Duhem Thesis to the Neurath Principle. In: Lehrer, K., Marek, J.C. (eds) Austrian Philosophy Past and Present. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 190. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5720-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5720-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6412-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5720-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics