Abstract
Rape seed showed a range of responses to light. When tested under standard germination conditions, they were unresponsive to light but under unfavourable germination conditions they tended to be inhibited by light. After prolonged exposure to sub-optimal germination conditions in darkness rape seed exhibited light sensitivity. Their germinability in darkness was considerably reduced, whilst their germinability in light was high. This light sensitivity was subsequently lost. Seeds being transferred from darkness to light during the germination test were not able to react to light any more. So, during germination tests in darkness seeds developed skotodormancy. Generally, there was no change of germinability when rape seed were imbibed under sub-optimal germination conditions in light. In one cultivar light inhibition was imposed but seeds of this cultivar remained highly germinable in darkness as well. So, after imbibition in light rape seed were never dormant in darkness. A pot experiment carried out to test the conclusions of the previous laboratory experiments under a more natural environment confirmed the strong impact of the light environment on the ability of rape seed to persist in darkness. It also confirmed genotypic differences identified in the laboratory studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bazanska, J. and Lewak, S. 1986. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 8:145–149.
Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. 1994. Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination, Second Edition, pp. 445. New York, London: Plenum Press.
Blanck, K.-D. 1989. Top-agrar Extraheft. Rapsanbau für Könner. 94–98.
Borthwick, H.A., Hendricks, S.B., Toole, E.H. and Toole, V.K. 1954. Botanical Gazette 115: 205–225.
Brown, J., Erickson, D.A., Davis, IB. and Brown, A.P. 1995. Proceedings of the 9th International Rape Seed Congress. 339–341.
Carruthers, S.P. 1995. Proceedings of the 9th International Rapeseed Congress. 1327–1331.
Frankland, B. 1976. In: Light and Plant Development, pp. 477–491 (ed. H. Smith). London: Butterworths.
ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). 1993. Seed Science and Technology 21: Supplement.
Kahn, A. 1960. Plant Physiology 35: 1–7.
Khan, A.A. and Karssen, CM. 1980. Plant Physiology 66: 175–181.
Lutman, PJ.W.1993. Aspects of Applied Biology 35: 29–36.
Michel, B.E. and Kaufmann, M.R. 1973. Plant Physiology 51: 914–916.
Pekran, C. 1994. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Pekrun, C. and Baeumer, K. 1992. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 5: 83–86.
Price, J.S., Hobson, R.N., Neale, M.A. and Bruce, D.M. 1996. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (in press).
Samimy, C. and Khan, A.A. 1983. Weed Science 31: 153–158.
Sauermann, W. 1993. Raps 11: 82–86.
Schlink, S. 1994. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Göttingen. Germany.
Taylorson, R.B. 1972. Weed Science 20: 417–422.
Vidaver, W. and Hsiao, A.I. 1975. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 2557–2560.
Wesson, G. and Wareing, P.F. 1969. Journal of Experimental Botany 20: 414–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pekrun, C., López-Granados, F., Lutman, P.J.W. (1997). Studies on the Persistence of Rape Seeds (Brassica napus L.), Emphasizing their Response to Light. In: Ellis, R.H., Black, M., Murdoch, A.J., Hong, T.D. (eds) Basic and Applied Aspects of Seed Biology. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5716-2_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5716-2_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6410-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5716-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive