Abstract
Israel Scheffler views moral education as having two major objectives: inculcating minimum standards of decent conduct and developing rationality in moral deliberation and judgment. The latter is to be achieved by engaging students in discussions of moral issues in such a way that they come to appreciate and follow standards of rational deliberation and judgment — standards that Scheffler explicates primarily in terms of impartiality. This paper argues that the conception of rational moral deliberation and discussion underlying Scheffler’s approach to moral education is inadequate, and suggests an alternative conception that gives far more prominence to the problem of interpreting the meaning of substantive moral concepts and determining how they apply to particular cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackerman, B.:1989, ‘Why Dialogue’, The Journal of Philosophy LXXXVI, 5–22.
Baier, K.: 1958, The Moral Point of View, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Coombs, J.R.: 1980, ‘Validating Moral Judgments by Principle Testing’, in D. Cochrane and M. Manley Casimir (eds.) Development of Moral Reasoning, Praeger, New York, pp. 14–29.
Dworkin, R.: 1977, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dworkin, R.: 1986, Lawis Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Frankena, W.: 1963, Ethics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Hare, R.M.: 1965, Freedom and Reason, Oxford University Press, New York.
Harman, G.: 1986, Change in View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hart, H.L.A.: 1967, ‘Philosophy of Law’, in P. Edwards (ed.) Encylopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 6, Macmillan, New York, pp. 264–276.
Jonsen, A. and Toulmin, S.: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry, University of California Press, Berkeley
Kovesi, J.: 1967, Moral Notions, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Levi, E.: 1949, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Pang, Y.Y.: 1994, Teaching Moral Concepts: A New Conception, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Pitkin, H.: 1972, Wittgenstein and Justice, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Scheffler, I.: 1973, Reason and Teaching, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Scheffer, I.: 1991, In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions, Routledge, New York.
Singer, M.: 1963, Generalization in Ethics, Eyre & Spottiswoode, London.
Wallace, J.D.: 1988, Moral Relevance and Moral Conflict, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Winkler, E.: 1993, ‘From Kantianism to Contextualism: The Rise and Fall of the Paradigm Theory in Bioethics’, in E. Winkler and J. Coombs (eds.) Applied Ethics: A Reader, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 343–366.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coombs, J.R. (1997). In Defense of Israel Scheffler’s Conception of Moral Education. In: Siegel, H. (eds) Reason and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5714-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5714-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4362-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5714-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive