Abstract
What Israel Scheffler analyzed in his The Language of Education was a corpus of slogans and metaphors which obviously influence public communication. But are these a language of “education”? The article argues that “language of education” is a historical enterprise that constitutes a special public discourse on and about education. The writings of the eminent educators developed and reflected this discourse, the language of education is composed out of typical arguments and suggestions not just of slogans and metaphors. And this corpus is historically very stable: The basic arguments are similar and there is little change in the basic creeds of what one can call the public language of education (to be opposed to philosophy of education).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benne, K.D.: 1951, ‘Education for Tragedy’, Educational Theory 1, pp. 199–210/217, 274-283.
Black, M.: 1944, ‘Education as Art and Discipline’, Ethics 54.
Blake, W.: 1977, The Complete Poems, A. Ostriker (ed.) Harmondsworth/Middlesex: Penguin Books.
Bloom, A.: 1987, The Closing of the American Mind. How Higher Education has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s Students, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bonnet, Ch.: 1755, Essai de psychologie; ou considerations sur les opérations de l’âme, sur l’habitude et sur l’éducation., Londres; repr. Hildesheim/New York: Georg Olms 1978.
Charbonnel, N.: 1991, Les aventures de la métaphore, Strasbourg: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg.
De Garmo, Chr.: 1985, Herbart and the Herbartians, New York: Scribner & Sons.
Dilthey, W.: 1888, ‘Über die Möglichkeit einer allgemeingültigen pädagogischen Wissenschaft.’ In Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Jahrgang 1888; repr. in Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. VI/pp. 56-82.
Egan, K.: 1988, ‘Metaphors in Collision: Objectives, Assembly Lines, and Stories’, Curriculum Inquiry 18, pp. 63–86.
Fischer, W.: 1990, ‘Über den Mangel an Skepsis in der Pädagogik’, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 36, pp. 729–743.
Frederick, O.I.: 1941, ‘Curriculum Development’, In W.S. Monroe (ed.): Encyclopedia of Educational Research, New York: The Macmillan Company.
Goodman, N.: 1978, Ways of Worldmaking, Hassocks/Sussex: Harvester Press.
Goodman, N.: 1981, Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Brighton/Sussex: Harvester Press.
Graff, G. (1992), ‘Teach the Conflicts’, In D.J. Gless & B. Herrnstein Smith (eds.): The Politics of Liberal Education, Durham/London: Duke University Press, pp. 57–93.
Grafton, A. and Jardine, L.: 1986, From Humanism to the Humanities. Educations and the Liberal Arts in Fifteenth and Sixteenth-Century Europe, London: Duckworth.
Habermas, J.: 1990, Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Mit einem Vorwort zur Neuauflage, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Hirst, P.H.: 1993, ‘Education, Knowledge and Practices’, In R. Barrow & P. White (Eds.): Beyond Liberal Education. Essays in Honour of Paul H. Hirst. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 184–199.
Hölscher, L.: 1979, Öffentlichkeit und Geheimnis. Eine begriffsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Entstehung der Öffentlichkeit in der frühen Neuzeit, Stuttgart: Klett.
Hurst, D.: 1964, Hidden Riches: Traditional Symbolism from the Renaissance to Blake, London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
Harnes, W.: 1909, A Pluralistic Universe. Hibbert Lectures at Manchester College on the Present Situation in Philosophy, New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Key, E.: 1909, The Century of the Child. New York/Lond: G.P. Putnam’s Sons/The Knickerbocker Press, repr. New York: Arno Press & The New York Times 1972.
Lamm-Pineau, E.: 1994, ‘Teaching is Performance: Reconceptualizing a Problematic Metaphor’. American Educational Research Journal 31, pp. 3–25.
Luhmann, N. and Schorr, K.-E. (Eds.): 1992, Zwischen Absicht und Person. Fragen an die Pädagogik, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Maritain, J.: 1943, Education at the Crossroads, Yale University Press.
Meiklejohn, A.: 1942, Education Between Two Worlds, New York/London: Harper & Brothers Publ.
Mills Harper, G.: 1961, The Neoplatonism of William Blake, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Montagu, A.: 1981, Growing Young, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nash, P., Kazamias, A.M. and Perkinson, H.J. (Eds.): 1965, The Educated Man. Studies in the History of Educational Thought, New York/London/Sidney: John Wiley & Sons.
Oelkers, J.: 1991, ‘Metapher und Wirklichkeit. Die Sprache der Pädagogik als Problem’, in J. Oelkers & K. Wegenast (Eds.), Das Symbol — Brücke des Verstehens, Stuttgard/Berlin/Köln: Kohlhammer, pp. 111–124.
Oelkers, J.: 1992, ‘Seele und Demiurg: Zur Historischen Genesis pädagogischer Wirkungs-massnahmen’, in N. Luhmann & K.E. Schorr (Eds.), Zwischen Absicht und Person. Fragen an die Pädagogik, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 11–57.
Oelkers, J. and Osterwalder, F. (Eds.): (1995), Pestalozzi Umfeld und Rezeption. Studien zur Historisierung einer Legende. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.
Osterwalder, F.: 1995, Pestalozzi als pädagogischer Kult. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.
Papert, S.: 1993, The Children’s Machine, New York: Basic Books.
Reboul, O.: 1984, Le langage d’éducation. Analyse du discours pédagogique, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Roger, J.: 1971, Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du XVIIIe siècle. La génération des animaux de Descartes à l’Encyclopédie, Seconde édition complétée. Paris: Armand Colin.
Rousseau, J.-J.: 1969, Ouvres complètes, éd. B. Gagnebin & M. Raymond; t. IV: Emile. Education — Morale — Botanique, Paris: Editions Gallimard.
Scheffler, I.: 1960, The Language of Education, Springfield Ill: Charles C. Thomas.
Scheffler, I.: 1985, Of Human Potential. An Essay in the Philosophy of Education, Boston/London/ Melbourne/Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Taylor, E. (Ed.): 1984, Metaphors of Education, London: Institute of Education.
Yolton, J.W.: 1991, Locke and French Materialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ziff, P.: 1953, ‘The Task of Defining a Work of Art’, The Philosophical Review 62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oelkers, J. (1997). Is There a “Language of Education”?. In: Siegel, H. (eds) Reason and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5714-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5714-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4362-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5714-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive