Skip to main content

Comparison Between Present Representations of the Motions of the Eight Major Satellites of Saturn

  • Conference paper
Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies
  • 327 Accesses

Abstract

We compare the two current representations (TASS and that of Harper and Taylor) of the motion of Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, Rhea, Titan, Hyperion and Japetus. Although both theories produce almost the same (o-c) residuals with the available observations, we show that they may give positions significantly different at dates corresponding to a gap in the distribution of these observations. In the interval 2000–2020 (corresponding to the CASSINI mission) these differences can reach 5 000 km for Mimas, 8 000 km for Hyperion, 6 000 km for Japetus. So, to test a theory of motions it is necessary to use other criteria among which the most important ones are its dynamical consistency and its internal accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dourneau, G.: 1993, “Orbital elements of the eight major satellites of Saturn determined from a fit of their theories of motion to observations from 1886 to 1985”, Astron. Astrophys. 267, 292–299.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez, L.: 1996, “Reviewing the theories of motion of the satellites of Saturn”, in: Dynamics, Ephemerides and Astrometry of the Solar System, IAU Symposium 172 (S. Ferraz-Mello, B. Morando, J.-E. Arlot, eds), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duriez, L. and Vienne, A.: 1997, “Theory of motion and ephemerides of Hyperion”, to appear in Astron. Astrophys..

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. and Taylor, D.B.: 1993, “The orbits of the major satellites of Saturn”, Astron. Astrophys. 268, 326–349}.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Strugnell, P.R. and Taylor, D.B.: 1990, “A catalog of ground-based observations of the eight major satellites of Saturn 1874–1989” Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 83, 289–300.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.B.: 1992, “A synthetic theory for the perturbations of Titan on Hyperion”, Astron. Astrophys. 265, 825–832.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vienne, A. and Duriez, L.: 1995, “TASS1.6: Ephemerides of the major Saturnian satellites”, Astron. Astrophys. 297, 588–605.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duriez, L., Vienne, A. (1997). Comparison Between Present Representations of the Motions of the Eight Major Satellites of Saturn. In: Wytrzyszczak, I.M., Lieske, J.H., Feldman, R.A. (eds) Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5534-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5534-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6330-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5534-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics