Skip to main content

Persons, Property or Both? Engelhardt on the Moral Status of Young Children

  • Chapter

Abstract

In his many contributions to the bioethics literature over the past quarter century, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. has addressed the question of the moral status of children a number of times, sometimes in passing and occasionally at greater length.1 Engelhardt typically distinguishes the moral status of younger children, including infants, from that of older children and adults; in this paper I will focus on his discussions of younger children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., “Viability, Abortion and the Difference Between a Fetus and an Infant,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 116 (1973): 429–434, also “The Ontology of Abortion,” Ethics 84 (1974): 217–234, “Ethical Issues in Aiding the Death of Young Children,” in M. Kohl ed., Beneficent Euthanasia (Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books, 1975), 180–192, also “On the Bounds of Freedom: From the Treatment of Fetuses to Euthanasia,” Connecticut Medicine 40 (1976): 51–55, also The Foundations of Bioethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), lastly The Foundations of Bioethics, Second Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 104–109; Foundations (1996), 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Engelhardt, Foundations (1996), 146–147.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 119; Foundations (1996), 149.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 129; Foundations (1996), 156.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engelhardt himself uses this example in The Foundations of Bioethics to illustrate the tension between parental rights to choose treatment for their children and societal intervention to protect children from harm. See Foundations (1996), 329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 120–121; Foundations (1996), 150.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engelhardt, “Viability, Abortion and the Difference” (1973), “The Ontology of Abortion” (1974), “Ethical Issues” (1975), also “On the Bounds of Freedom” (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 104–156, and Foundations (1996), 135–188.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engelhardt, “The Ontology of Abortion,” 223–225, and Foundations (1986), 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 117.

    Google Scholar 

  13. In his most recent writing on this subject in the second edition of The Foundations of Bioethics, Engelhardt appears to have abandoned the sharp distinction he had previously drawn between the moral status of fetuses and that of infants. In the following passage, for example, Engelhardt seems willing to allow a social sense of personhood to be applied to fetuses as well as infants: “Still, in general secular terms a protected social role might be justified, or at least established within particular formal or informal agreements, for embryos, infants and others....” Foundations (1996), 147; emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engelhardt, “The Ontology of Abortion,” 231.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 115.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Engelhardt, “Ethical Issues,” 183–185; Foundations (1986), 117–119; Foundations (1996), 148–149.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 127–135; Foundations (1996), 154–166.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 129; Foundations (1996), 156.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 134; Foundations (1996), 165.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  22. John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 133–172.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tibor R. Machan, “Between Parents and Children,” Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (1992): 17.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 289–290; Foundations (1996), 329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 129.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 287–288; Foundations (1996), 327–328.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Archard, Children: Rights and Childhood (London: Routledge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Engelhardt, Foundations (1986), 128–129; Foundations, (1996), 155–156.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Page, “Parental Rights,” in B. Almond and D. Hill, eds., Applied Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1991), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moskop, J.C. (1997). Persons, Property or Both? Engelhardt on the Moral Status of Young Children. In: Minogue, B.P., Palmer-Fernández, G., Reagan, J.E. (eds) Reading Engelhardt. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5530-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5530-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6328-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5530-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics