Skip to main content

Closure-Invariant Rationality Postulates

  • Chapter
Logic, Action and Cognition

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 2))

  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of closure-invariance, which can be used in studies of the operations on a belief set (theory) that are generated by operations on a base for that belief set. Section 1 provides an introduction to belief bases and to knowledge-level analysis. In section 2, two major approaches to contraction of belief bases are introduced, and in section 3 some representation theorems are reported for the operations on belief sets that are generated by various types of contraction operators on bases. In section 4, the notion of closure-invariance is introduced, and in sections 5–7 some variations of closure-invariance are discussed. The Appendix contains a series of results on contractions of finite sets that are referred to in sections 4–5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C. E., and Makinson, D., Hierarchies of Regulation and Their Logic, pp. 125–148 in Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic, D. Reider Publishing Company, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alchourrón, C. E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D., On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50 (1985): 510–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alchourrón, C. E., and Makinson, D., On the Logic of Theory Change: Safe Contraction, Studio Logica, 44 (1985): 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brachman, R. J., and Levesque, H.J., What Makes a Knowledge Base Knowledgeable? A View of Databases from the Knowledge Level, pp. 69–78 in Kerschberg (ed.), Expert Database Systems, Proceeding from the first international workshop, The Benjarnin/Cummings Publishing Company, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuhrmann, A., Theory Contraction Through Base Contraction, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 20 (1991): 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gärdenfors, P., An Epistemic Approach to Conditionals, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18 (1981): 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gärdenfors, P., Knowledge in Flux. Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States., The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gärdenfors, P., and Rott, H., Belief Revision, pp. 35–132 in Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Gabbay, Hogger, and Robinson (eds.), vol 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hansson, S. O., Belief Contraction Without Recovery, Studia Logica, 50 (1991): 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansson, S. O., A Dyadic Representation of Belief, pp. 89–121 in Gärdenfors (ed.), Belief Revision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansson, S. O., Similarity Semantics and Minimal Changes of Belief, Erkenntnis, 37 (1992): 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansson, S. O., Changes on Disjunctively Closed Bases, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2 (1993): 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson, S. O., Kernel Contraction, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 59 (1994): 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansson, S. O., Reversing the Levi Identity, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22 (1993): 637–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansson, S. O., Theory Contraction and Base Contraction Unified, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58 (1993): 602–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson, S. O., Hidden Structures of Belief, pp. 79–100 in Fuhrmann and Rott (eds.), Logic, Action and Information, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levi, I., Subjunctives, Dispositions and Chances, Synthese, 34 (1977): 423–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levi, I., The Enterprise of Knowledge, MTT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newell, A., The Knowledge Level, Artificial Intelligence, 18 (1982): 87–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rott, H., Preferential Belief Change Using Generalized Epistemic Entrenchment, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 1 (1992):45–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rott, H., Belief contraction in the context of the general theory of rational choice, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58 (1993): 1426–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rott, H., Modellings for Belief Change: Prioritization and Entrenchment, Theoria, 58 (1992): 21–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hansson, S.O. (1997). Closure-Invariant Rationality Postulates. In: Ejerhed, E., Lindström, S. (eds) Logic, Action and Cognition. Trends in Logic, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5524-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5524-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6326-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5524-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics