Abstract
I would like to address, from two different perspectives, the question of the criteria used in evaluating research papers in mathematics education. The first perspective, which I will call theoretical, encompasses the principles on which an evaluation is said to rest. A scholarly journal would normally spell out such principles in a policy statement, which would take the form of a set of guidelines and a list of criteria, supported by a rationale. In most cases such a policy statement would represent the best efforts of the board of editors in setting out how they believe the merits of a research paper should be judged. The editors would expect that reviewers (themselves included) would have a good understanding of these criteria and would apply them consistently to research papers submitted to the journal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bourke, S.: 1993, ‘Babies, Bathwater and Straw Persons: A Response to Menon’, Mathematics Education Research Journal 5(1), 19–22.
Clements, M. A.: 1993, ‘Statistical Significance Testing: Providing Historical Perspectives for Menon’s Paper’, Mathematics Education Research Journal 5(1), 23–27.
Dörfler, W.: 1993, ‘Quality Criteria in the Field of Didactics of Mathematics’, in G. Nissen & M. Blomhøj (eds.), Criteria for Scientific Quality and Relevance in the Didactics of Mathematics, Danish Research Council for the Humanities, Roskilde, 75–87.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education: 1996, Information for Reviewers, unpublished manuscript.
Kilpatrick, J.: 1993, ‘Beyond Face Value: Assessing Research in Mathematics Education’, in G. Nissen & M. Blomhøj (eds.) Criteria for Scientific Quality and Relevance in the Didactics of Mathematics, Danish Research Council for the Humanities, Roskilde, 15–34.
Koshland, D. E.: 1985, ‘An Editor’s Quest’, Science 227, 4684.
Menon, R.: 1993a, ‘Statistical Significance Testing Should Be Discontinued in Mathematics Education Research’, Mathematics Education Research Journal 5(1), 4–18.
Menon, R.: 1993b, ‘Take Off Those Blinkers, Mate! Response to Bourke, Clements and Rowley’. Mathematics Education Research Journal 5(1), 30–33.
Rowley, G.: 1993, ‘Response to Menon’, Mathematics Education Research Journal 5(1), 38–39.
Sierpinska, A.: 1993, ‘Criteria for Scientific Quality and Relevance in the Didactics of Mathematics’, in G. Nissen & M. Blomhøj (eds.), Criteria for Scientific Quality and Relevance in the Didactics of Mathematics, Danish Research Council for the Humanities, Roskilde, 35–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanna, G. (1998). Evaluating Research Papers in Mathematics Education. In: Sierpinska, A., Kilpatrick, J. (eds) Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for Identity. New ICMI Studies Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5470-3_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5470-3_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4600-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5470-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive