Skip to main content

Toward Optimal Observer Performance of Detection and Discrimination Tasks on Reconstructions from Sparse Data

  • Conference paper
  • 914 Accesses

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 79))

Abstract

It is well known that image assessment is task dependent. This is demonstrated in the context of images reconstructed from sparse data using MEM- SYS3. We demonstrate that the problem of determining the regularization- or hy- perparameter α has a task-dependent character independent of whether the images are viewed by human observers or by classical or neural-net classifiers. This issue is not addressed by Bayesian image analysts. We suggest, however, that knowledge of the task, or the use to which the images are to be put, is a form of prior knowledge that should be incorporated into a Bayesian analysis. We sketch a frequent ist approach that may serve as a guide to a Bayesian solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Rossmann, “Image quality and patient exposure,” Current Problems in Radiology, 2(2), pp. 1–34, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.G. Brown, M.F. Insana, and M. Tapiovaara, “Detection performance of the ideal decision function and its McLaurin expansion: Signal position unknown,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, pp. 379–398, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.F. Wagner, K.J. Myers, A.E. Burgess, D.G. Brown, and M.J. Tapiovaara, “Maximum a posteriori detection: Figures of merit for detection under uncertainty,” Proc. SPIE 1232, pp. 195–204, (Bellingham WA) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.D. Whalen, Detection of Signals in Noise, (Electrical Science Series) Academic Press, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.M. Hanson, “Making binary decisions based on the posterior probability distribution associated with tomographic reconstructions,” in Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, C.R. Smith, G.J. Erickson, and P.O. Neudorfer, eds., pp 313–326, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.J. Myers, R.F. Wagner, and K.M. Hanson, “Binary task performance on images reconstructed using MEMSYS3: Comparison of machine and human observers,” in Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, A. Mohammad-Djafari and G. Demoment, eds., pp. 415–421, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.M. Hanson and K.J. Myers, “Rayleigh task performance as a method to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms,” in Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, W.T. Grandy Jr., and L.H. Schick, eds., pp. 303–312, Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands, 1991.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. S.F. Gull and J. Skilling, Quantified Maximum Entropy “MEMSYS 3” Users’ Manual, Maximum Entropy Data Consultants Ltd., Royston England, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Skilling and S.F. Gull, “Bayesian maximum entropy image reconstruction,” in Spatial Statistics and Imaging, A. Possolo, ed., pp. 341–367, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes-Monograph Series 20, IMS, Hay ward CA, 1991.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. J.O. Berger, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. C.K. Abbey and H.H. Barrett, “Linear iterative reconstruction algorithms: Study of observer performance,” in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Y. Bizais et al. eds., pp. 65–76, Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.M. Hanson, “Variations in task and the ideal observer,” Proc. SPIE 419, pp. 60–67, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K.J. Myers, J.P. Rolland, H.H. Barrett, and R.F. Wagner, “Aperture optimization for emission imaging: Effect of a spatially varying background,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A7, pp. 1279–1293, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H.H. Barrett, “Objective assessment of image quality: Effects of quantum noise and object variability,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A7, pp. 1266–1278, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H.H. Barrett, J.L. Denny, R.F. Wagner, and K.J. Myers, “Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk and figures of merit for task performance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A12, pp. 834–852, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wagner, R.F., Myers, K.J., Brown, D.G., Anderson, M.P., Hanson, K.M. (1996). Toward Optimal Observer Performance of Detection and Discrimination Tasks on Reconstructions from Sparse Data. In: Hanson, K.M., Silver, R.N. (eds) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5430-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5430-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6284-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5430-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics