Skip to main content
  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

Renal transplantation has become the definitive treatment for end stage renal failure in those patients fit enough to benefit from it. It gives patients a better quality of life, free from dialysis, spares patients and the health service the costs of providing dialysis systems, and it lightens the load and economic pressure on renal units which face increasing demands while remaining under-resourced [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McGeown MG. Prevalence of advanced renal failure in Northern Ireland. Br Med J 1990; 301: 900–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grenvik A. Brain death and organ transplantation: a forty year review. Opuscule Med 37: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Evans RW, Orians CE. Asher NL. Potential supply of organ donors: an assessment of the efficiency of organ procurement efforts in the Ended States. JAMA 1992: 267: 339–46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hylander B, Lindblad H. Kjellstrand CM. Changing patient characteristics and chronic haemodialysis. Stand J Urol Nephrol 1991; 25: 59–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Emond JC, Heftron TE. Kurtz EO. Gonzales-VaIIinir Contis JC, Black DD. Whittington PF. Improved results of living related liver transplantation with routine application in a paediatric programme. Transplantation 1993; 55: 835–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka K. Uernoto S. Tokunaga Y. Fujita S, Sano K, Nishizawa T, Sawad H. Schriahase I. Kim HJ. Yamaoka Y. Surgical techniques and innovations in living related liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1993: 217: 82–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutherland D. Single pancreas transplantation. In: Groth CG (ed.). Pancreatic Transplantation. WB Saunders and Co. Philadelphia 1988; p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  8. British Transplantation Society recommendations on the use of living kidney donors in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 1986; 293: 257–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sells RA. Voluntarism of consent in both related and unrelated living organ donors. In: Land W. Dossetor JB (eds), Organ Replacement Therapy: Ethics. Justice and Commerce. Springer-Verlag. Munich 1991; pp. 18–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy et alAnn Intern Med 1986; 106: 719.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seaquist ER. Robertson RP. Effects of hemi-pancreatectomy on pancreatic alpha and beta cell function in healthy donors. Clin Invest 1992: 89: 1761–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Busuttil RW. Living related liver donation. Transplant Proc 1991: 23: 43–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones M. Medical Negligence. Sweet and Maxwell, London 1991; p. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simmons R. Long-term reactions of renal recipients and donors. In: Levy NB (ed.). Psychonephrology. Plenum, New York 1983; pp. 275–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Council of the Transplantation Society. Lancet 1985; 2: 715.

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization, 1991. Human Organ Transplantation: a report on the development under the auspices of WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salahudeen AK. Woods HF, Pingle A. Neur-El-Hudea Sulayman M. Shakuntela K, Mandakumar M. Yahya TM, Daar AS. High mortality among recipients of bought living unrelated donor kidneys. Lancet 1990; 336: 725–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy KC. Thiagarajan CM. Shunmugasundarm D, Jayachandran R. Nayar P. Thomas S, Ramachandran V. Unconventional renal transplantation in India. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 910–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blumstein JF. Governments’ role in organ transplantation policy. In: Blumstein J. Sloan F (eds) Organ Transplantation, Policy. Issues and Prospects. Duke University Press, Durham and London 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beecham T. Childress J Principles of Bio-medical Ethics, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Ness York. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Radcliffe-Richards J. In: Kjellstrand CM, Dossetor JB (eds), Ethical Problems in Dialysis and Transplantation. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1992; p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singhvi LM, Jain SC, Nundy S, Vas CJ. Report of the Group Constituted to Examine the Proposal for Enactment of Legislation for the Use of Human Organs and Their Donation for Therapeutic Purposes. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Manickaval V. In: Kjellstrand CM, Dossetor JB (eds), Ethical Problems in Dialysis and Transplantation. Kluwer, Dorcrecht 1992; p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sells RA. Some ethical issues in organ retrieval 1982–1992. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 2401–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sells, R.A. (1997). Voluntarism and coercion in living organ donation. In: Collins, G.M., Dubernard, J.M., Land, W., Persijn, G.G. (eds) Procurement, Preservation and Allocation of Vascularized Organs. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5422-2_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5422-2_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5422-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics