Skip to main content

Pulsatile preservation in renal transplantation

  • Chapter

Abstract

A subtle but important part of the success of cadaveric renal transplantation has been effective and prolonged organ preservation. During the early 1970s, pulsatile perfusion for preservation of kidneys was used by the majority of centres in the United States. This gradually changed later in the decade to a predominance of simple cold storage. There were a number of reasons for this change, including reports demonstrating few or no benefits of pulsatile perfusion over cold storage, as well as the perception that cold storage was significantly easier to accomplish from a technical standpoint and was less expensive. Interestingly, there now appears to be a trend towards pulsatile perfusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sanfilippo F, Vaughn WK, Spces EK, Lucas BA. The detrimental effects of delayed graft function in cadaver donor renal transplantation. Transplantation 1984; 38: 643–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Halloran PF, Aprile MA, Farewell V et al. Early yunction as the principal correlate of graft survival. Transplantation 1988; 46: 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim EC, Terasaki PI. Early graft function. In: Terasaki P, Cecka JM, (eds.), Clinical Transplants 1991. UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, Los Angeles 1992; pp. 401–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson RM and the Transplant Information Shire Group (TISG). A multicenter experience with sequeni ial ALOI cyclosporine therapy in renal transplantation. Clin ‘transplant 1988; 2: 285.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cecka JM, Terasaki PI. The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry — 1990. In: Terasaki P (ed.), Clinical Transplants 1990. UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, Los Angeles 1991; p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, Lim E, Takemoto S, Cho Y Gjertson ll, Ogura K, Koyama H, Mitsuishi Y, Yuge J, Cohn M. Overview. In: Terasaki P (ed.), Clinical Transplants 1991 UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, Los Angeles 1992; p. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenthal JT, Danovitch GM, Wilkinson A, Ettenger RB. The high cost of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1991: 51: 1115–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson CP, Roza AM, Adams MB. Local procurement with pulsatile perfusion gives excellent results and minimizes initial cost associated with renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 385–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zucker K, Cirocco R, Roth D et al.Depletion of hepatitis C virus from procured kidneys using pulsatile perfusion preservation. Transplantation 1994; 57: 832–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann RM, Stratta RJ, D’Alessandro AM et al.Combined cold storage-perfusion preservation with a new synthetic perfusate. Transplantation 1989; 47: 32–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruessner RW, Nakhleh R. Tzardis P et al. Rejection in single versus combined pancreas and kidney transplantation in pigs. Transplantation 1993; 56: 1053–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alijani MR, Cutler JA, DelValle CJ et al.Single-donor cold storage versus machine perfusion in cadaver kidney preservation. Transplantation 1985; 40: 659–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Merlon RM, Oh HK, Port FK, Toledo-Percyra LH. Turcotte JG. A prospective controlled trial of cold-storage versus machine-perfusion preservation in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1990: 50: 230–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Halloran P, Aprile M. A randomized prospective trial of cold storage versus pulsatile perfusion for cadaver kidney preservation. Transplantation 1987: 43: 827–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mendez R, Mendez KG, Koussa N. Cats S, Bogaard TP, Khetan U. Preservation effect on oligo-anuria in the cyclo-sporine era: a prospective trial with 26 paired cadaveric renal allografts. Transplant Proc 1987: 19: 2047–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heil JE, Canafax DM, Sutherland DER, Simmons RL, Dunning M, Najarian JS. A controlled comparison of kidney preservation by two methods: machine perfusion and cold storage. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 2046.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koyama H. Cecka IM. Terasaki PI. A comparison of cadaver donor kidney storage methods: pump perfusion and cold storage solutions. Clin Transplantation 1993: 7: 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henry ML, Sommer BG. Ferguson RM. Improved immediate function of renal allografts with better perfusate. Transplantation 1988:45: 73–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Henry ML, Sommer BG. Tesi RJ, Ferguson RM. Improved immediate renal allograft function after initial simple cold storage. Transplant Proc 1990: 22: 388–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tesi RJ. Elkhammas EA, Davies EA, Henry ML, Ferguson RM. Pulsatile kidney perfusion for evaluation of high-risk kidney donors safely expands the donor pool. Clin Transplant 1994: 8: 134–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henry, M.L. (1997). Pulsatile preservation in renal transplantation. In: Collins, G.M., Dubernard, J.M., Land, W., Persijn, G.G. (eds) Procurement, Preservation and Allocation of Vascularized Organs. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5422-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5422-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5422-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics