Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary tool for optimizing agricultural production and erosion: a conceptual model

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development ((SAAD,volume 5))

Abstract

What are the areas in a catchment where soil conservation practices can be most effectively implemented? To be able to answer that question, erosion rates and farm profitability from different land uses need to be optimized according to physical economic and social constraints, which differ for the interest groups in and outside a catchment. The Interdisciplinary Tool for Optimizing Productivity and Erosion (ITOPE), a conceptual model at this point, offers the opportunity for hydrologists, economists and anthropologists to integrate their knowledge about the erosion problem. It optimizes farm profitability and soil loss and quantifies the economic impact of soil conservation measures for subcatchments, given physical, social and economic constraints, by linking a hydrologic model, a multiple criteria optimization model and an expert system. It should serve as a tool for regional planners, which ensures that social and economic boundary conditions for each of the interest groups in a watershed are considered. It should also serve as a negotiation tool for groups inside and outside the watershed, to allocate the costs and benefits of soil conservation. The development of the conceptual model has led to the observation of interdisciplinary methodological opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold J G, Williams J R, Nicks A D, Sammons N B (1990) SWRRB, a basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Tex., USA. 142 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J G, Williams J R, Maidment D R (1995) Continuous-time water and sediment routing model for large basins. J. Hydrol. Eng. 121(2):171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J G, Williams J R, Srinivasan R, King K W (1996) SWAT, soil and water assessment tool. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, Tex., USA. 102 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • AVRDC — Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (1995) Progress report 1994. AVRDC, Shanhua, Tainan, Taiwan (ROC). 520 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster J S, Johnson J C (1989) Form or function: A comparison of expert and novice judgements of similarity among fish. Am. Anthropol. 91:866–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman R (1994) Recent developments in land use planning, with special reference to FAO. Pages 11–21 in Fresco L O, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, Van Keulen H (Eds.) The future of the land: Mobilising nd integrating knowledge for land use options. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson R N, Lovelady C N, Flamm R O, Spradling S L, Saunders M C (1991) Intelligent geographic information systems for natural resource management. Quantitative Methods Landscape Ecol. 82:153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot W T (1992) Environmental science theory, concepts and methods in a one-world, problem-oriented paradigm. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 583 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieng R, Giboin A, Tourtier P, Corby O (1992) Knowledge acquisition for explainable multi-expert, knowledge-based design systems. Pages 298–317 in Siekmann J (Ed.) Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchessi P, O’Keefe R M (1992) Contrasting successful and unsuccessful expert systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 61:122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather J R, Keating N C (1994) Goals and management styles of New Zealand farmers. Agric. Syst. 44:181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl M A, Estes J E, Star J L (1988) Advanced formation-extraction tools in remote sensing for earth science application: AI and GIS. AI Appl. 2(2–3):17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furbee L (1989) A folk expert system: Soils classification in the Colca Valley, Peru. Anthropol. Q. 62(2):83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy P R, Eyzaguirre P, Boerboom L (1994) The institutional and organizational implications of integrating natural resource management and production-oriented research. Pages 139–152 in Goldsworthy P R, Penning de Vries F W T (Eds.) Opportunities, use, and transfer of systems research methods in agriculture to developing countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer W I (1981) Soil conservation consultant report. Part A: A soil degradation assessment methodology, Technical note No. 7. Center for Soil Research, Bogor, Indonesia. 50 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits M J (1941) Economics and anthropology, a rejoinder. J. Political Econ. 49:269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson P (1990) Introduction to expert systems. 2nd Edition. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK. 526 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R (1992) Multi objective decision support for environmental management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 232 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight F H (1941) Anthropology and economics. J. Political Econ. 49:247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger R A (1988) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA. 197 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • KSL — Knowledge Systems Laboratory (1994) FuzzyCLIPS version 6.02: User’s guide. National Research Council, Canada. 71 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou Y I (1992) Collaborative knowledge acquisition. Expert Syst. Appl. 5:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger D G (1995) Microeconomic theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. 486 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod K R, Reeves G R (1993) AXIS: A framework for interactively combining structured algorithms and knowledge based systems. Comput. Oper. Res. 20(6):613–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarea-Sandoval V D (1995) Local knowledge and agricultural decisionmaking in the Philippines, class, gender, and resistance. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA. 226 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo A, Oad R, Podmore T H (1994) An integrated expert system for optimal crop planning. Agric. Syst. 45:73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant R E (1993) Expert systems in agriculture and resource management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 43:241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röling N (1994) Platforms for decisionmaking about ecosystems. Pages 385–393 in Fresco L O, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, Van Keulen H (Eds.) The future of the land: Mobilising and integrating knowledge for land use options. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney A K, Weiler S C, Batchelder W H (1986) Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. Am. Anthropol. 88:313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H K (1989) Economic man: The anthropology of economics. 2nd Edition. Sheffield Publishing Company, Salem, WI, USA. 278 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H A (1992) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Pages 39–54 in Egidi M, Marris R (Eds.) Economics, bounded rationality, and the cognitive revolution. Edward Elgar Publisher, Brookfield, VT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan R, Arnold J G (1994) Integration of a basin-scale water quality model with GIS. Water Res. Bull. 30(3):453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer R E (1989) Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation and application. 2nd Edition. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL, USA. 546 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer R E (1994) Random problem generation and the computation of efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming. Comput. Organ. Appl. 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L A (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8:118–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boerboom, L.G.J., Flitcroft, I.D., Kanemasu, E.T. (1997). Interdisciplinary tool for optimizing agricultural production and erosion: a conceptual model. In: Teng, P.S., Kropff, M.J., ten Berge, H.F.M., Dent, J.B., Lansigan, F.P., van Laar, H.H. (eds) Applications of Systems Approaches at the Farm and Regional Levels Volume 1. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5416-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5416-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6278-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5416-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics