Abstract
Good models are perceived as accurate, simple and having explanatory power. In practice, these are all bundled together. But the balance between these three attributes, and the strength of their expression, change depending on the use to which the model is put: whether for a technical, a practical or an emancipatory purpose. The relative emphasis on the accuracy of technical models may be misplaced if they are to be used to facilitate performance in a practical situation or to promote emancipation by providing a framework that allows individuals to work through their own problems. Farming practice issues may be better handled by building upon farmers’ own heuristic models, with relatively greater emphasis on simplicity. Similarly, emancipatory issues can be more appropriately handled through educational models that stimulate and facilitate insight into system behaviour, with relative emphasis on explanatory power. The issue of the articulation of different model categories becomes important as models are used to design and engineer changes in the models used by others for different purposes, and as work is done simultaneously with different model categories to achieve a particular purpose.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Casti J L (1992) Reality rules. Picturing the world in mathematics. II. The frontier. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. 424 p.
Cox P G (1996) Some issues in the design of agricultural decision support systems. Agric. Syst. (in press).
Cox P G, MacLeod N D, Ridge P E, Shulman A D (1996a) Reengineering agricultural R,D&E to support management decision-making: Problems and prospects. Pages 168–171 in Proceedings of the 8th Australian Agronomy Conference. 29 January–2 February 1996, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland. The Australian Society of Agronomy Inc., Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Cox P G, Shulman A D, Ridge P E, Foale M A, Garside A L (1996b) An interrogative approach to system diagnosis: An invitation to the dance. J. Farming Syst. Res. Ext. (in press).
Dorward A (1991) Integrated decisions rules as farm management tools in smallholder agriculture in Malawi. J. Agric. Econ. 42(2):146–159.
Dorward A (1994) Farm planning with resource uncertainty: A semi-sequential approach. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 21:309–324.
Dorward A, Parton K A (1996) Quantitative whole farm models and embedded risk in complex, diverse and risk prone agriculture. J. Agric. Econ. (in press).
Flood R L, Jackson M C (1991) Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
Hardaker J B, Pandey S, Patten L H (1991) Farm planning under uncertainty: A review of alternative programming models. Rev. Marketing Agric. Econ. 59(1):9–22.
Hazell P B R, Norton R D (1986) Mathematical programming for economic analysis in agriculture. Macmillan, New York, USA. 400 p.
McCown R L, Wafula B M, Mohammad L, Ryan J G, Hargreaves J N G (1991) Assessing the value of a seasonal rainfall predictor to agronomic decisions: The case of response farming in Kenya. Pages 383–410 in Muchow R C, Bellamy J A (Eds.) Climatic risk in crop production: Models and management for the semiarid tropics and subtropics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
McCown R L, Hammer G L, Hargreaves J N G, Holzworth D P, Freebairn D M (1996) APSIM: A novel software system for model development, model testing, and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agric. Syst. 50:255–271.
Murray-Prior R (1994) Fanners as scientists: A personal construct theory interpretation of hierarchical decision models. Paper presented at 38th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, 7–11 February 1994, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Pannell D J, Malcolm B, Kingwell S (1996) Are we risking too much? Perspectives on risk in farm modelling and farm management. Am. J. Agric. Econ. (in press).
Pfeffer J (1992) Managing with power. Politics and influences in organisations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA. 391 p.
Rae A N (1971a) Stochastic programming, utility, and sequential decision problems in farm management. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 53(3):448–460.
Rae A N (1971b) An empirical application and evaluation of discrete stochastic programming in farm management. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 53(4):625–638.
Ryle G (1963) The concept of mind. Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK. 316 p.
Shulman A D, Penman R (1992) Developing information infrastructures that work. Pages 1–7 in Service delivery communications in the 1990s. Department of Transport and Communication, Canberra, Australia.
Sneiderman B (1987) Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA. 448 p.
Talbott S L (1995) The future does not compute. Transcending the machines in our midst. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol. 481 p.
Thornton P K, Hoogenboom G (1994) A computer program to analyze single-season crop model outputs. Agron. J. 86:860–868.
Thornton P K, Hoogenboom G, Wilkens P W, Bowen W T (1995) A computer program to analyze multiple-season crop model outputs. Agron. J. 87:131–136.
Walker D H, Johnson A K L, Bellamy J A (1995) Development of a decision support system for improved natural resource management in the Herbert River catchment. Paper presented at the National Conference on Downstream Effects of Land Use, 26–28 April 1995, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.
Wise M N (Ed.) (1995) The values of precision. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA. 372 p.
Woodruff D R (1992) WHEATMAN: A decision support system for wheat management in subtropical Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 43:1483–1499.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cox, P.G., Parton, K.A., Shulman, A.D., Ridge, P.E. (1997). On the articulation of simulation and heuristic models of agricultural production systems. In: Teng, P.S., Kropff, M.J., ten Berge, H.F.M., Dent, J.B., Lansigan, F.P., van Laar, H.H. (eds) Applications of Systems Approaches at the Farm and Regional Levels Volume 1. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5416-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5416-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6278-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5416-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive