Skip to main content

The residual calcular fragment: A risk factor for recurrent stone disease

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Developments in Nephrology ((DINE,volume 38))

Abstract

Calcular fragments (residuals) left behind after initial therapy of stone may grow with time, especially in patients with metabolically active stone disease [1]. Each fragment can become a nidus for a new stone [1] which grows in size by as much as 25% over two years [2]. Many so-called recurrences, especially those seen soon after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), may be due to growth of residuals which had not been detected on post-treatment X-rays. Observed ‘recurrent stone’ formation is three times more common when a residual stone is present and the higher rate of recurrence seen in patients with multiple stones (16% vs. 5% in simple stones) may result from the more frequent residuals left in such patients. Residuals encourage recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI), when they occur in patients with pretreatment UTI and consequently new stone formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Segura JW. The role of percutaneous surgery in renal and ureteral stone. J Urol 1989;141:780.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenberger F, Rassweiler G, Bub P et al. Differential approach to staghorn calculi using ESWL and PCN; an analysis of 151 consecutive patients. World J Urol 1987;5:248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaussey C, Schmeidt E. ESWL for kidney stones, an alternative to surgery? Urol Radiol 1984;6:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liedl B, Joacham D, Schuster C, Haupt G. Prognosis of residual calculi after ESWL. Urol Res 1987;15:128.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miles SG, Kandi JV, Newman RC et al. ESWL, prevalence of renal stones 3–21 months after treatment. Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:307–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rielhe R A Jr, Fan W R, Vaughan E D Jr. ESWL for upper urinary tract calculi. A one year experience at single center. J Am Med Assoc 1986;255:2043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drach GW, Dretler S, Fair W et al. Report of the US cooperative study of ESWL. J Urol 1986;135:1127–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neils Peter, Bucholz N-P, Meier-Padel S, Rutishauser G. Minor residual fragments after ESWL, spontaneous clearance or risk of recurrence? Abstract 391, p. 180, Société International d’Urologie, 23rd Congress, Syndey, Australia; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown RD, Pak CYC, Preminger GM. Effect of lithotripsy on stone forming risk factors. J Urol 1989;141:207A.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Banner MP. ESWL: Selection of patients and long term complications. Radiol Clin 1991;21:543–56.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pfab R, Kloiber W, Kropp W et al. The endoscopically radiologically non recognizable residual fragment. Urol Res 1987;15:127.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jewett MAS, Bombardier C, Caron D et al. Potential for interobserver and intraobserver variability in X-ray review to establish stone free rates after lithotripsy. J Urol 1992;147:559–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sachs EM, Fajardo LL, Hilman BJ et al. Prospective comparison of plain X-ray abdominal radiography with conventional and digital tomography in assessing ESWL patients. J Urol 1990;144:1341–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abernathy BB, Wilson WT, Morris JS et al. Evaluation of residual stone fragments after lithotripsy: Sonography vs KUB. J Urol 1989;141:176A.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sandlow JI, Winfield HN, Loening SA. Does ESWI augment stone recurrence? J Urol 1989;141:407A.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silverman DE, Stamey TA. Management of infection stones: Stanford experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 1983;62:44–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huggoson J, Grenabo L, Hedelin H, Petersen S. Residual concrements and UTI, Abstracts of the 13th Urolithiasis Symposium. Uro Res 1987;15:127.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfister RC, Dretler SP, Yoder IC. Percutaneous catheter dissolution of renal stones. Br J Urol 1983; Supplement: 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vogel E, Schultz W, Lehmer A et al. Toxicological studies of stone dissolving solutions. Uro Res 1987;15:126.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schmeller NT, Kersting H, Schuller J, et al. Combination of Chemolysis and shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment of cystine renal calculi. J Urol 1988; 131: 434–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sampio FJB, Afonso HMA. Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: Its possible role in ESWL. J Urol 1992;147:322–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Obsitnik M, Skutil V, Lutter I et al. Cause of the residual stone in patients with complete staghorn calculi treated by nephrotomy or percutaneous litholapaxy. Urol Res 1987;15:127.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodman JS, Williams JJ, Peterson CM. Uric acid calculi can be dissolved by prolonged oral therapy. J Urol 1984;131:1039–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Talati, J. (1997). The residual calcular fragment: A risk factor for recurrent stone disease. In: Talati, J., Sutton, R.A.L., Moazam, F., Ahmed, M. (eds) The Management of Lithiasis. Developments in Nephrology, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5396-6_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5396-6_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6270-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5396-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics