Skip to main content

Treatment of Chronic Liver Disease. Do Cytoprotective Agents Interfere with Drug-Metabolizing Activity?

  • Chapter
  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

There is evidence that interferon (IFN) depresses antipyrine and theophylline clearances, thus impairing the drug-metabolizing activity (DMA), whereas ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment is associated with controversial findings regarding changes in quantitative liver function tests (LFTs). IFN (Intron A, 6 million units (MU) tiw), a membrane-stabilizing agent — UDCA (Deursil, 600 mg/day) and a new formulation of a free-radical scavenger — silibinin ß cyclodextrin (IBI/S, 135 mg/day) were given to a total of 32 patients with chronic liver disease for 6 months. Liver function, as assessed by routine LFTs and the formation of monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) from lidocaine (1 mg/kg iv), was evaluated before and after treatment. For comparison, LFTs and MEGX were also estimated in 10 matched patients with chronic liver disease who received no therapy for 6 months. In the IFN-treated patients the 45-min MEGX values (normal value = 79.1 ± 3.3 ng/ml) were 58.2 ±4.9 at time 0 and increased by 20% during treatment (69.8 ± 5.0); mean ALT levels decreased from 173 ± 20 U/L at time 0 to 98 ± 22 after treatment (p <0.02); AST decreased by 27% whereas γ-GT levels did not vary significantly. MEGX values were virtually unchanged during UDCA and IBI/S administration (respectively, 45.5±5.2 and 53.7±7.6 at entry vs. 47.7±6.3 and 57.4±5.7 at month 6) whereas transaminase levels decreased by 16–30% after UDCA treatment and by 9–19% after IBI/S treatment. Moreover, UDCA and IBI/S caused a 36% and a 24% reduction of γ-GT levels, respectively. In the control group, MEGX values remained stable throughout the 6-month period and so did transaminase and γ-GT levels. Moreover, no correlation was found between the changes in LFTs and the 45-min MEGX values in any of the groups studied. Thus, in patients with chronic liver disease, a 6 months’ treatment with different cytoprotective agents was associated with an improvement in the common markers of liver function but with no significant changes in MEGX formation. These results suggest a lack of interference of tested drugs with DMA and favour the association of various cytoprotective agents with improved treatment outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Poupon R, Poupon RE, Calmous Y et al. Is ursodeoxycholic acid an effective treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis? Lancet. 1987;11:834–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cotting J, Lentze MJ, Reichen J. Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment on nutrition and liver function in patients with cystic fibrosis and longstanding cholestasis. Gut. 1990;31:918–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Podda M, Ghezzi C, Battezzati PM et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid, taurine or a combination of the two for chronic hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:1044–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Plevris JN, Hayes PC, Bouchier IAD. Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of alcoholic liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1991;3:653–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Poupon RE, Poupon R, Balkau B and the UDCA—PBC Study Group. Ursodiol for the long-term treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1342–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beccarello A, Lirussi F, Bortolato L et al. Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and its taurine-conjugate (TUDCA) in HCV-related and unrelated cirrhosis. Gut. 1994;35(suppl 5):A153.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lirussi F, Nassuato G, Orlando R et al. Treatment of active cirrhosis with ursodeoxycholic acid and a free radical scavenger: a two year prospective study. Med Sci Res. 1995;23:31–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferenci P, Dragosic B, Dittrich H et al. Randomized controlled trial of silymarin treatment in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. J Hepatol. 1989;9:105–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Meister A. New developments in glutathione metabolism and their potential application in therapy. Hepatology. 1984;4:739–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frezza M, Surrenti C, Marzillo G et al. Oral S-adenosyl-Lmethionine in the symptomatic treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:211–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tinè F, Magrin S, Craxi A et al. Interferon for non-A non-B chronic hepatitis. A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. J Hepatol. 1991;13:192–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chemello L, Alberti A, Rose K et al. Hepatitis C serotype and response to interferon therapy. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lampertico P, Rumi MG, Romeo R et al. A multicentre randomized trial of recombinant interferonalpha-2b in patients with acute transfusion-associated hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1994;19:19–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Booth JCL, Brown JL, Thomas HC. The management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Gut. 1995;37:449–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Bisceglie AM, Shindo M, Fong TL et al. A pilot study of ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1992;16:649–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kakumu S, Yoshioka K, Wakita T et al. A pilot study of ribavirin and interferon beta for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:507–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Angelico M, Gandin C, Pescarmona E et al. Recombinant interferon-a and ursodeoxycholic acid vs interferon-a alone in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:263–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boucher E, Jouanolle H, Andre P et al. Interferon and ursodeoxycholic acid combined therapy in the treatment of chronic viral C hepatitis: results from a controlled randomized trial in 80 patients. Hepatology. 1995;21:322–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beloqui O, Prieto J, Suarez M et al. N-Acetyl cysteine enhances the response to interferon-alfa in chronic hepatitis C: A pilot study. J Interferon Res. 1993;13:279–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bircher J. Quantitative assessment of deranged hepatic function: A missed opportunity? Semin Liv Dis. 1983;3:275–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oellerich M, Raude E. Monoethylglycinexylidide formation kinetics: a novel approach to assessment of liver function. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1987;25:845–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichen J, Widmer T, Cotting J. Accurate prediction of death by serial determination of galactose elimination capacity in primary biliary cirrhosis: a comparison with the Mayo model. Hepatology. 1991;14:504–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oellerich M, Burdelski M, Ringe B et al. Lignocaine metabolite formation as a measure of pre-transplant liver function. Lancet. 1989;i:640–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leuschner U, Fischer H, Kurtz W et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a controlled double-blind trial. Gastroenterology. 1989;97:1268–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lotterer E, Stiehl A, Raedsch R et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: no evidence for toxicity in the stages Ito III. J Hepatol. 1990;10:284–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lirussi F, Okolicsanyi L. Cytoprotection with ursodeoxycholic acid: effect in chronic non-cholestatic and chronic cholestatic liver disease. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1992;24:31–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams SJ, Farrel GC. Inhibition of antipyrine metabolism by interferon. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;22:610–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Williams SJ, Baird-Lambert JA, Farrel GC. Inhibition of theophylline metabolism by interferon. Lancet. 1987;ii:939–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Okuno H, Kitao Y, Takasu M et al. Depression of drug metabolizing activity in the human liver by interferon-α. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39:365–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Okuno H, Takasu M, Kano H et al. Depression of drug-metabolizing activity in the human liver by interferon-ß. Hepatology. 1993;17:65–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beccarello, A., Bortolato, L., Paleari, C., Triches, C., Awasum, M., Lirussi, F. (1997). Treatment of Chronic Liver Disease. Do Cytoprotective Agents Interfere with Drug-Metabolizing Activity?. In: Mózsik, G., Nagy, L., Pár, A., Rainsford, K.D. (eds) Cell Injury and Protection in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5392-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5392-8_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6268-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5392-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics