Skip to main content

Family Labor Market Incentives: Men and Women Working for Pay

  • Chapter
Household and Family Economics

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 51))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

By now the facts governing gender labor market outcomes are well known: Women earn less than men, work in different occupations, and major in less market oriented fields. Over the life cycle, women’s wages rise less quickly, but are fairly comparable at least initially when both men and women start working. Being married is associated with lower wages for women, but higher wages for men, yet single men and women fare almost equally. Children exacerbate the male-female wage gap, so that wage differentials are higher among married men and women the greater the family size. Husbands and wives typically have large wage differences in families with large child age disparities than when families are completed in short periods of time. Finally, women commute less to work, work fewer hours, and tend to be more intermittent in the labor force than men. Indeed many of these patterns date as far back as written records.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • D. Aigner and G. Cain, “Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, (January 1977) 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Becker, The Economics of Discrimination, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Becker, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis With Special Reference to Education, (New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research), 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Becker, “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor,” Journal of Labor Economics, 1985, 3:S33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Becker and B. Chiswick, “Education and the Distribution of Earnings,” American Economic Review, (May 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Becker and K. Murphy “The Family and the State,” Journal of Law and Economics, 1988, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Beller, “Occupational Segregation by Sex: Determinants and Changes”, Journal of Human Resources, (Spring 1982), p.390.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Beller “Trends in Occupational Segregation by Sex and Race: 1960–1981” in B. F. Reskin, ed., Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, and Remedies, (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press) 1984, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoram Ben-Porath, “The Production of Human Capital Over the Life Cycle,” Journal of Political Economy, (August 1967) Part 1, 352–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bergmann “Occupational Segregation, Wages and Profits When Employers Discriminate By Race and Sex,” Eastern Economic Journal, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bergmann, “The Economic Risks of Being a Housewife,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 1981, 71:81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bergmann The Economic Emergence of Women, New York: Basic Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bergmann “Does the Market for Women Need Fixing?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, (Winter 1989), 43–60).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Blau, Equal Pay in the Office (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books), 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan Blinder, Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates,” Journal of Human Resources, (Fall 1973), 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Butler, “Estimating Wage Discrimination in the Labor Market,” Journal of Human Resources, (Fall 1982), 606–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cain and M. Dooley “Estimation of a Model of Labor Supply, Fertility, and Wages of Married Women,” Journal of Political Economy, 1976 Supplement, 84:S179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Cardwell and M. Rosenzweig, “Economic Mobility, Monopsonistic Discrimination and Sex Differences in Wages,” Southern Economic Journal 46(1980), 1130–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick, J. Fackler, J. O’Neill, and S. Polachek, “The Effect of Occupation on Race and Sex Hourly Earnings,” Review of Public Data Use, (April 1975) 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Chu, “Wage Differentials in Peninsula Malaysia,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Corcoran and G. Duncan, “Work History, Labor Force Attachment, and Earnings Differences Between Races and Sexes,” Journal of Human Resources, 1979 14:3–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Corcoran, G. Duncan and M. Ponza, “A Longitudinal Analysis of White Women’s Wages,” Journal of Human Resources, 1983 18:494–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Dolton, “The Statistical Measurement of Discrimination,” Economic Letters, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Edgeworth, “Equal Pay to Men and Women,” Economic Journal, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. England, “The Failure of Human Capital Theory to Explain Occupational Sex Segregation,” Journal of Human Resources, (1982) 358–370

    Google Scholar 

  • P. England, “The Failure of the Human Capital Theory to Explain Occupational Sex Segregation,” Journal of Human Resources, (Summer 1982), 358–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. England, G. Farkas, and T. Dou, “Explaining Occupational Sex Segregation and Wages: Findings from a Model with Fixed Effects,” mimeo (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Fuchs, “Differences in Hourly Earnings Between Men and Women,” Monthly Labor Review, (May 1971)9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Gannicott “Women, Wages and Discrimination: Some Evidence From Taiwan,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 34(4) (1986) 721–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Goldin “The Changing Role of Women: A Quantitative Approach,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 1983, 707–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Goldin, “The Earnings Gap in Historical Perspective,” in the U. S. Civil Rights Commission, Comparable Worth: Issues for the 80’s, 1984: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Goldin Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women, Oxford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Goldin and S. Polachek, “Residual Differences by Sex: Perspectives on the Gender Gap in Wages,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gregory and R. Duncan, “The Relevance of Segmented Labor Market Theories: The Australian Experience of the Achievement of Equal Pay for Women,” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, (Spring 1981) 404–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gronau “Sex Related Wage Differentials and Women’s Interrupted Work Careers — The Chicken or the Egg,” Journal of Labor Economics, 1988, 6:277–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Groshen, “The Structure of the Female/Male Wage Differential: Is it Who You Are, What You Do, or Where You Work?” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper 8708 (September 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gunderson, “Decomposition of the Male-Female Earnings Differential: Canada 1970,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 12 (August 1979), 479–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Gustafsson, “Male-Female Lifetime Earnings Differentials And Labor Force History,” in Studies in Labor Market Behavior: Sweden and the United States, (G. Eliasson et. al., eds.) Stockholm: IUI (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hay, “Occupational Choice and Occupational Earnings: Selectivity Bias in a Simultaneous Logit-OLS Model”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Johnson and J. Skinner “Labor Supply and marital Separation,” American Economic Review, 1986 76:455–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Jones, “On Decomposing the Wage Gap: A Critical Comment on Blinder’s Method,” Journal of Human Resources, (Winter 1983) 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Joshi, “Participation in Paid Work: Evidence From the Women in Employment Survey,” in R. Blundell and I. Walker (eds.) Unemployment, Search and Labor Supply, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Joshi, “The Cash Opportunity Costs of Child Bearing,” Economic Policy Research Unit Discussion Paper 208, London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kao, “A Human Capital Approach to Male-Female Wage Differentials in Taiwan,” Ph.D. Dissertation, SUNY-Binghamton, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Killingsworth and J. Heckman “Female Labor Supply: A Survey,” in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, North-Holland Press, 1986, 103–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Killingsworth, Labor Supply, Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Kim and S. Polachek, “Panel Estimates of Male and Female Earnings Functions,” Paper Presented at the Conference on the Economic Weil-Being of Women and Children, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Revised December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Klerman and A. Leibowitz, “The Work-Employment Distinction Among Mothers of Very Young Children,” Paper presented at the conference on the Economic Well-Being of Women and Children, University of Minnesota, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Korenman and D. Neumark, “Sources of Bias in Women’s Wage Equations: Results Using Sibling Data,” Paper Presented at the Conference on the Economic Well-Being of Women and Children, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Kuratani, “A Theory of Training, Earnings and Employment: An Application to Japan,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Landes, “Sex Differences in Wages and Employment: A Test of the Specific Training Hypothesis,” Economic Inquiry, (1977) 523–538

    Google Scholar 

  • CM. Lindsay and M.T. Maloney, “A Model and Some Evidence Concerning the Influence of Discrimination on Wages,” Economic Inquiry, 26: October 1988, 645–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Madden “Discrimination: A Manifestation of Male Market Power,” in Sex, Discrimination, and the Division of Labor, C Lloyd, ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Madden, “Gender differences in the Cost of Displacement: An Empirical Test of Discrimination in the Labor Market,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, May 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Madden “Why Women Work Closer to Home,” Urban Studies, 1981,18:181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Malkiel and J. Malkiel, “Male-Female Pay Differentials in Professional Employment,” American Economic Review, (September 1973), 693–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Martin and C. Roberts Women and Employment, London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Merrill “Wage Suppression of Married Women Induced by Geographic Immobility”, Ph.D. Dissertation, SUNY Binghamton, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer, “Investment in Human Capital and Personal Distribution of Income, Journal of Political Economy, (August 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer “Labor Force Participation of Married Women,” in Universities National Bureau of Economic Research, Aspects of Labor Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962: 63–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer, “On-the-Job Training: Costs, Returns, and Some Implications,” Journal of Political Economy, (October 1962, Supplement) 50–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer, “The Distribution of Labor Incomes: A Survey With Special Reference to the Human Capital Approach,” Journal of Economic Literature, (March 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer, Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research) 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer, “Family Migration Decisions,” Journal of Political Economy, October 1978, 86:749–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer, “Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and of Related Developments: An Overview,” Journal of Labor Economics, 1985, S1–S31.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer, and H. Ofek, “Interrupted Work Careers: Depreciation and Restoration of Human Capital,” Journal of Human Resources, 1982,17:3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer and S. Polachek, “Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women,” Journal of Political Economy, (March/April 1974, Part 2) S76–S108.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mincer and S. Polachek, “Women’s Earnings Reexamined,” Journal of Human Resources, 1978 13:118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Montgomery and S. Trussell “Models of Marital Status and Child Bearing,” in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics 1986, 205–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Neimi and C. Lloyd “Female Labor Supply in the Context of Inflation,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 1981, 71:70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Neumark “Employer’s Discriminatory Tastes and the Estimation of Wage Discrimination” Journal of Human Resources, 1988, 23:279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. O’Neill, “A Time Series Analysis of Women’s Labor Force Participation,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 1981, 71:76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. O’Neill and S. Polachek, “Why the Gender Gap in Wages Narrowed in the 1980s,” Manuscript, November 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Oaxaca, “Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets,” International Economic Review, (October 1973), 693–709

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Paglin and A. Rufolo “Heterogeneous Human Capital, Occupational Choice, and Male-Female Wage Differences,” Journal of Labor Economics, 1990, 8:123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Pencavel “Labor Supply of Men: A Survey,” in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics 1986, 3–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Peters “Marriage and Divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting,” American Economic Review, 198676:437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Phelps, “The Statistical Theory of Sexism and Racism,” American Economic Review, (September 1972), 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Discontinuous Labor Force Participation and Its Effect on Women’s Market Earnings,” in C. Lloyd, Sex, Discrimination, and the Division of Labor, (New York: Columbia University Press), 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Differences in Expected Post-School Investment As A Determinant of Market Wage Differentials,” International Economic Review, (1975a).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Potential Biases in Measuring Male-Female Discrimination,” Journal of Human Resources, (Spring 1975b) 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Occupational Segregation Among Women: An Alternative Hypothesis,” Journal of Contemporary Business, Winter 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Sex Discrimination: Who Is At Fault?,” The Collegiate Forum, Fall 1977, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Differences in Expected Post-School Investment As A Determinant of Market Wage Differentials,” International Economic Review. (1979a)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Occupational Segregation Among Women: Theory, Evidence, and A Prognosis,” in Women in the Labor Market (C. Lloyd, et. al. eds.) New York: Columbia University Press, 1979b 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Secular Changes in Female Job Aspirations,” in R.L. Clark (ed.) Retirement in an Aging Society (Durham: Duke University Press, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 1981 58:60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Women in the Economy: Perspectives on Gender Inequality,” in Comparable Worth: Issue for the 80’s, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Civil Rights Commission, 1984: 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Occupational Segregation: A Defense of Human Capital Predictions,” Journal of Human Resources, (Summer 1985), 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Occupational Segregation and The Gender Wage Gap,” Population Research and Policy Review, (1987) 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek, “Trends in the Male-Female Wage Gap: The 1980s Compared to the 1970s,” Paper Presented at 1990 AEA Meetings, Washington, D.C., December 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek and Francis Horvath, “A Life Cycle Approach to Migration: Analysis of the Perspicacious Peregrinator,” in R. Ehrenberg, ed., Research in Labor Economics, JAI Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek and C. Kao, “Lifetime Work Expectations and Estimates of Sex Discrimination,” Paper Presented at the “New Approaches to the Analysis of Discrimination” Conference, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, (April 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek and W.S. Siebert, The Economics of Earnings, (Cambridge University Press), forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Polachek and B. Yoon, “A Two-Tiered Earnings Frontier Estimation of Employer and Employee Information in the Labor Market,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Preston and A. Richards “The Influence of Women’s Work Opportunities on Marriage Rates,” Demography, 1975,12: 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Rathbone, “The Remuneration of Women’s Services,” Economic Journal, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Reskin and H. Hartmann eds. Women’s Work, Men’s Work: Sex Segregation On The Job, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Robinson’s The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London: Macmillan and Company, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Roos, “Marital Differences in Occupational Distribution and Attainment,” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America,” Washington, D.C, (March 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rosenzweig and P. Schultz “The Demand for and Supply of Births,” American Economic Review, 1986,76:992–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Sandell, “Discussion,” American Economic Review, (May 1972) p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Sandell, “Women and the Economics of Family Migration,” Review of Economics and Statistics, (November 1977)406–414).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Sandell and D. Shapiro, “Work Expectations, Human Capital Accumulation, and the Wages of Young Women,” Journal of Human Resources, (Summer 1980), 15:335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Sander “Women, Work and Divorce,” American Economic Review, 1985 75:519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Schippers and J. J. Siegers, “Women’s Relative Wage Rate in the Netherlands, 1950–1983: A Test of Alternative Theories of Discrimination Theories,” De Economist, (1986) 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Schultz “Changing World Prices, Women’s Wages and the Fertility Transition: Sweden 1860–1910,” Journal of Political Economy, 1985 93:1126–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.S. Siebert, “Inequality of Opportunity: An analysis Based on the Microeconomics of the Family,” in R. Drago and R. Perlman (eds.) Microeconomic Issues in Labor Economics, Brighton: Harvester, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • W.S. Siebert and A. Young, “Sex and Family Status Differentials in Professional Earnings: The Core of Liberalisms” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1983:30: 18–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.S. Siebert and P. Sloane “The Measurement of Sex and Marital Status Discrimination in the Work Place,” Economica, 1981, 48: 125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Smith and M. Ward, “Women in the Labor Market and in the Family,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, (Winter 1989) 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Trends, 1981, Table 1.11,1988, Table 1.13.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Solon and G. Johnson, “Estimates of the Direct Effect of Comparable Worth Policy,” American Economic Review 1986:176:117–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sorenson, “The Crowding Hypothesis and Comparable Worth,” Journal of Human Resources 25:1, (Winter 1990) 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sprague “Post-War Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation Rates,” Economic Journal, 1988, 98:682–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Treiman and H. Hartman, eds. Women, Work and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value, Washington: National Academy Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Labour Force Survey, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Annual Abstract of Statistics, various numbers.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Census, 1981, Qualified Manpower Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Statistical Abstract, Various Years.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Vanek “Time Spent in Housework,” Scientific American, November 1974, 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polachek, S.W., Siebert, W.S. (1996). Family Labor Market Incentives: Men and Women Working for Pay. In: Menchik, P.L. (eds) Household and Family Economics. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5384-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5384-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6264-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5384-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics