Skip to main content

Economic and Psychological Aspects of Valuing Risk Reduction

  • Chapter
Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods

Part of the book series: Studies in Risk and Uncertainty ((SIRU,volume 10))

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

The appropriate approach to valuing risk reduction depends in large part on one’s intent. In the case of government regulatory efforts, the overall objective is typically to value changes in risk. These policies have a small incremental effect in reducing risk, and the typical policy question is how much society is willing to pay for this reduction. When risks are being imposed involuntarily, the objective is often to determine how much the person bearing the risk must be compensated. This measure consequently focuses on a willingness-to-accept amount, which for small changes in risk should reflect the same tradeoff rate as the willingness-to-pay amount.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referenes

  • Allais, M. (1953), “Le comportement de l’Homme Rationnnel Devant le Risque:Critque des Postulats et Axioms de l’Ecole Americane,” Econometrica 21:503–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961), “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch et al. (1981), Acceptable Risk (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D. (1980), “Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 95: 537–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47: 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick, Alan J. and Maureen L. Cropper (1992), “The Effect of Information on Health Risk Valuations,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(1): 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. et al. (1978), “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 4: 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magat, Wesley A., W. Kip Viscusi, and Joel Huber (1991), “The Death Risk Lottery Metric for Health Risks: Cancer and Nerve Disease,” Duke University Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1979), “Are We All Among the Better Drivers?” Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1974), “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip (1979), Employment Hazards: An Investigation of Market Performance, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip (1989), “Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of the Paradoxes,” The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2(3): 235–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip (1992a), Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip (1992b), Smoking: Making the Risky Decision, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip (1993), “The Value of Risks to Life and Health,” Journal of Economic Literature XXXI(4): 1912–1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip and William Evans (1990), “Utility Functions that Depend on Health Status: Estimates and Economic Implications,” American Economic Review 80(3): 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip and Wesley A. Magat (1987), Learning About Risk: Consumer and Worker Responses to Hazard Information, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip and Wesley A. Magat (1992), “Bayesian Decisions with Ambiguous Belief Aversion,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4): 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley A. Magat, and Anne Forrest (1988), “Altruistic and Private Valuations of Risk Reduction,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7(2): 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley A. Magat, and Joel Huber (1987), “An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks,” Rand Journal of Economics 18(4): 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley A. Magat, and Joel Huber (1991), “Pricing Environmental Health Risks: Survey Assessments of Risk-Risk and Risk-Dollar Tradeoffs for Chronic Bronchitis,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21(1): 32–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, and Charles O’Connor (1984), “Adaptive Responses to Chemical Labeling: Are Workers Bayesian Decision Makers?” American Economic Review 74(5): 942–956.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Viscusi, W.K. (1997). Economic and Psychological Aspects of Valuing Risk Reduction. In: Kopp, R.J., Pommerehne, W.W., Schwarz, N. (eds) Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods. Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5364-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5364-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6255-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5364-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics