Skip to main content

Measuring Non-Use Values: Theory and Empirical Applications

  • Chapter
Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods

Part of the book series: Studies in Risk and Uncertainty ((SIRU,volume 10))

Abstract

In keeping with our assignment, this paper will focus on measurement. We will devote far less time to the microeconomic theory of non-use values than many readers might expect. Non-use values are now well entrenched in the theory of the consumer (Krutilla 1967; Randall and Stoll 1983; Madariaga and McConnell 1987; Boyle and Bishop 1987; Smith 1987; Bishop and Welsh 1992; Freeman 1993). We shall want to briefly review the theory as a foundation for what will follow, but need not dwell on it at length. The central focus will instead be on measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishop, R.C., P.A. Champ, D.J. Mullarkey. 1995. “Contingent Valuation.” Handbook of Environmental Economics. Ed. D.W. Bromley. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 629–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R.C. and T.A. Heberlein. 1979. “Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(5):926–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R.C. and M.P. Welsh. 1992. “Existence Values in Benefit-Cost Analysis and Damage Assessment.” Land Economics 68(4):405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R.C., M.P. Welsh, and T.A. Heberlein. 1993. “Some Experimental Evidence on the Validity of Contingent Valuation.” Unpublished paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin--Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, P. 1972. “Estimating Demand for Public Goods: An Experiment.” European Economic Review 3:111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohrnstedt, G.W. 1983. “Measurement.” Handbook of Survey Research Eds. P.H. Rossi, J.D. Wright, and A.B Anderson. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, R.R., T.C. Brown, G.D. McClelland, G.L. Peterson, and W.D. Schulze. 1989. “Experimental Evidence of Existence Value in Payment and Compensation Contexts.” Paper presented at the joint meetings of the Western Committee on the Benefits and Costs of Natural Resource Planning (W133) and the Western Regional Science Association, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K.J., and R.C. Bishop. 1987. “Valuing Wildlife in Benefit-Cost Analyses: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species.” Water Resources Research 23(5):943–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R.T., N.E. Flores, K.M. Martin, and J.L. Wright. Forthcoming. “Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preferences Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods.” Land Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R.T., W. Michael Hanemann, and Robert C. Mitchell. 1986. “Determining the Demand for Public Goods by Simulating Referendums at Different Tax Prices.” Manuscript, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champ, P.A., R.C. Bishop, T.C. Brown and D.W. McCollum. 1994. “Some Evidence Concerning the Validity of Contingent Valuation: Preliminary Results of an Experiment.” Ed. R.C. Ready, W-133 Seventh Interim Report Western Regional Research Publication, Lexington, KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, D.L., J.J. Hovis, and W.D. Schulze. 1987. “The Disparity between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:679–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R. and P. Shapiro. “Private Preference for Collective Goods Revealed Through Voting in Referenda.” American Economic Review 65(5):943–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P.A., J.A. Hausman, F.R. Johnson, R.W. Dunford, K.J. Boyle, S.P. Hudson, and K.N. Wilson. 1992. “Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability.” Paper presented at the Cambridge Economics, Inc. symposium titled “Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment”, Washington, D.C., April 2 and 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, M., A. Fisher, and S. Gerking. 1987. “Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82:69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, J.W., and D.A. Patterson. 1992. “Field Testing Existence Values: Comparison of Hypothetical and Cash Transaction Values.” Paper presented at the joint meetings of the Western Committee on the Benefits and Costs of Natural Resource Planning (W133) and the Western Regional Science Association, South Lake Tahoe, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischoff, B., and L. Furby. 1988. “Measuring Values: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Transactions with Special Reference to Contingent Valuation of Visibility.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1:147–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman III, M. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn, J.P., and A. Randall. 1987. “A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14(3):226–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and J.L. Knetsch. 1992. “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22(1):57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kealy, M.J., M. Montgomery, J.F. Dovidio. 1990. “Reliability and Predictive Validity of Contingent Values: Does the Nature of the Good Matter?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19:244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J.V. “Conservation Reconsidered.” American Economic Review 57: 777–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga, B., and K.E. McConnell. 1987. “Exploring Existence Value.” Water Resources Research 23(5):936–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. 1994. “Contingent Valuation and Social Choice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(4):689–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, H.R., R.G. Cummings, P.T. Ganderton, G.W. Harrison, and T. McGuckin. 1994. “Hypothetical Surveys and Economic Commitments.” Land Economics 70:145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A., and J.R. Stoll. 1983. “Existence Value in a Total Valuation Framework” in Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas Eds. R.D. Rowe and L.G. Chestnut. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seip, K., and J. Strand. 1992. “Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: A Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment.” Environmental and Resource Economics 2(1):91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.K. 1987. “Nonuse Calues in Benefit-Cost Analysis.” Southern Economic Journal 51:19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, B.M. and M. Wondyalew. 1994. “Evaluating Willingness to Contribute to a Local Public Good: Application of Contingent Valuation to Tsetse Control in Ethiopia.” Ecological Economics 11:153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bishop, R.C., Champ, P.A., Brown, T.C., McCollum, D.W. (1997). Measuring Non-Use Values: Theory and Empirical Applications. In: Kopp, R.J., Pommerehne, W.W., Schwarz, N. (eds) Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods. Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5364-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5364-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6255-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5364-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics